Viewing profile — albedoa
albedoa
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 04, 2011, 9:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,695
- Public activity
- 982 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About albedoa
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49216462
Ignoring the other side of the equation is a pretty wild thing for you to do here: > I'm running it in Oh My Pi with a second instance running as "advisor" and even with 5-6 active…
-
comment
Comment #49191382
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49185318
The article claims multiple times that the cops used the interstate travel as a pretext for the search that turned up the marijuana, but in most jurisdictions, the arrest would hav…
-
comment
Comment #49160013
How were any of us meant to know that you were using your own personal and undisclosed definition of a well-established phrase?
-
comment
Comment #49118641
> Why? >> Slavery > Yes it's bad. Are you just learning about the slavery or did you know about it when you asked why.
-
comment
Comment #49117241
> or want to cook before the IPO What IPO is that?
-
comment
Comment #49082303
> He could not see the note we were talking about because he is colorblind. A similar thing happened to a friend who was over for game night. We were playing the Monopoly Deal card…
-
comment
Comment #49064606
Literally the point is that sites are showing the banner by default practice even when they are not tracking. You understand this! Your kind comes into every one of these threads a…
-
comment
Comment #49064568
Wow that's so deep man.
-
comment
Comment #49047443
That is the point being made.
-
comment
Comment #48980659
> I suppose I agree with you that any nuanced discussion is impossible. I didn't say that. My politics probably align with yours, and I agree that a nuanced discussion on this topi…
-
comment
Comment #48980479
You really detracted from your point and killed any hope for a nuanced discussion by begging the question. You could have simply asked the model which system is more efficient.
-
comment
Comment #48959156
OP referenced the roof rule by name in the OP, which was quoted in the comment that you are replying to. What do you mean "an entirely different topic"?
-
comment
Comment #48959039
Pause and consider the joint probability that anything was autocorrected to "roof rule" and that it just so happens to be the name of one of their rules.
-
comment
Comment #48955124
I'm almost on board with what you're saying, except Photoshop had a two-decade advantage both in its technological advancement and in becoming the industry standard, including by i…
-
comment
Comment #48935025
It's unfathomably weird of you to frame an article as a source for your claim and then wait for someone to point out that the article does not support your claim before admitting t…
-
comment
Comment #48934933
> it's the same infinite music library No it's not. That is absurdly wrong. You can ignore whoever led you to believe it. > I get that artists aren't paid enough, but it's better t…
-
comment
Comment #48934773
> I wasn't sure if this post was lamenting the loss of discovery or the loss of stable revenue streams for artists. I haven't read the article yet, but the most devastating loss wa…
-
comment
Comment #48915917
The point is very clear to the rest of us. You inserted the word "full" where the author was not talking about full agency. It's hard to believe that you don't follow.
-
comment
Comment #48852709
What do you mean "i don't think so"? What is it about the comment you are replying to that you don't think?
-
comment
Comment #48731996
> Without hard facts the expression is just a wishy-washy way to promote a personal taste. For a moment there, you almost had us thinking that you were interested in learning somet…
-
comment
Comment #48722836
In fact, the politics of my local bakery are among the easiest to be aware of! These people are telling on themselves.
-
comment
Comment #48712622
Where did you run off to little boy.
-
comment
Comment #48712585
His account is a realtime view of a freak having a mental breakdown, and the mods are like "this is fine" lol.
-
comment
Comment #48709686
Whoops, looks like my insight about you was entirely accurate how can that be: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48643270