Viewing profile — agsdfgsd

[dead]

Again, if you want to alter behavior you need to be clear about what the behavior you oppose is. This is my understanding of a flamewar: https://www.webopedia.com/TERM/F/flame_war.…

>that the presence of hate-spewing and minority-oppressing fascists is not wanted. But the bulk of the people being targeted are none of those things. What the average person is se…

[flagged]

>We must not tolerate intolerance, because that kills tolerance overall. I see people repeat that, but I don't see anything to indicate it is true. Quite the contrary, it would app…

The myth is that 90% were involved in food production in any way. Butchers and millers and brewers and bakers are part of that 90%, they were not doing anything in any fields. But …

>The internet has allowed him and his ilk a bigger voice, platforms to more efficiently spread their ideology and organize. But again, that's not authoritarianism. Quite the contra…

>I mean Hitler's economy was a conquest dependent mess No it wasn't. The economic recovery occurred way before the war did.

>If this were important, surely some scientist would have found holes in the theories no? Yes, and they have. But you ignore them and slander them and then say "see, nobody has fou…

[flagged]

I love how in modern discourse, nazi apologists predate nazis.

No they didn't. We have books on farming that are 2000 years old, people have read them even. Just because movies show dirty peasants hoeing fields doesn't mean that was reality.

>The evidence of harm is far from conclusive, and given the replication crisis, your stating these claims as facts is completely unjustified. Then say "I don't believe that" instea…

>Many things didn't exist before the 1900s, that still doesn't entail they are harmful. Stop trying to reverse my statement because you think that will allow you to dismiss it. I s…

I have not made any extraordinary claims, I have repeated the very standard scientific consensus, which is constantly repeated in the popular media. I do not presume that every pie…

>The former isn’t true for income Wealth inequality is not about income is it? >doesn’t remain true for wealth for more than a couple generations So, it only remains true for as lo…

>But they don’t have modern medicine Yes, we've covered that haven't we? In the very post you just replied to, in order to add absolutely nothing to the discussion? >Indigenous tri…

>Nobody lives in the Stone Age today. That’s a period of time. Yes they do. It is a period of technological development. There is no singular timespan that makes up the stone age o…

I don't follow. How did that get us "into this mess"? Maybe I am confused about what exactly you consider to be "this mess".

>Citation please. https://www.google.com/search?q=co2%20plant%20nutrition >Naturalistic fallacy. "Industrial waste" isn't necessarily harmful. It is not a naturalistic fallacy. The…

[flagged]

I am not dismissing medicine. But the existence of medicine now does not mean life centuries ago was a horrifying existence struggling to survive as popular culture suggests. There…

>Even if we have less nutritious food, which is debatable It really isn't, it has been measured. With increased atmospheric CO2, plants grow faster and end up with a much higher ca…

>The current western world order is still much more fair to the common folk than feudalism. That's the common perception, but there's little evidence that it is true. Modern peons …

>the idea of people mostly staying put over that time frame is demolished. That idea was never put forward. Again, a nation is a people. >It's about fear, where origin is a proxy. …