Viewing profile — _8ysf
_8ysf
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Nov 15, 2024, 6:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About _8ysf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41903122
"In 2019, France’s best known climate expert sat down to work with its most feted graphic novelist. The result? Perhaps the most terrifying comic ever drawn. Part history, part ana…
- story
-
comment
Comment #37390529
The answered: > Thank you for your message. Please read this article to learn more about objecting to the processing of your personal information: https://faq.whatsapp.com/12851155…
-
comment
Comment #37390498
> That doesn't mean they're in plain text. MTProto 2.0 is an audited and robust algorithm. Nope, but it means that they are not E2EE. Meaning that the Telegram server (and whoever …
-
comment
Comment #37334957
> You'd be right, if you had any proof of WhatsApp being E2EE in the traditional sense. Fair point. Though last time I checked Telegram, nothing except the secret chats was end-to-…
-
comment
Comment #37313458
The risk being that the experience will be miserable. I can totally imagine a world where you can talk between Signal and WhatsApp, but reactions don't work, sending files doesn't …
-
comment
Comment #37313422
If you read my link above, WhatsApp literally told me that I could object to some data collection as per the EU regulations . WhatsApp showed me a popup telling me that!
-
comment
Comment #37313412
I think you totally missed the point. Let me rephrase it: as per the EU legislation , I got a popup in WhatsApp that was saying that I have a right to object to their data collecti…
-
comment
Comment #37313339
The whole point of my question is that I want to see how far I can leverage the GDPR with WhatsApp. I do use other apps, but that is not the question :-)
-
comment
Comment #37313316
I understand the idea (though I find Telegram worse than WhatsApp in that it's not even properly end-to-end encrypted). But the idea here is really to see how far I can go about as…
-
comment
Comment #37313276
If they do, yes. But somehow I doubt it...
-
comment
Comment #37310492
Man you have no clue how many people I moved to Signal. I actually contributed to Signal years ago. So respectfully, f** you (if you're going on that tone). There are just some peo…
-
comment
Comment #37306767
Sure, I just can't talk to my friends and family there :-).
-
comment
Comment #37305991
Good point, I asked them that.
-
comment
Comment #37305987
Well Signal Messenger is nice. I am using WhatsApp because of network effect: some people are on WhatsApp and not on something else (Signal is the most popular alternative where I …
-
story
Ask HN: How can I meaningfully object to WhatsApp processing of my information?
Following some EU requirements (GDPR), WhatsApp updated their TOS. They say that we can now "object to [their] use of [our] information": https://faq.whatsapp.com/781249240131848/.…
-
comment
Comment #35307918
> Joking of course but we are not that far away from that. I couldn't disagree more :). I think we are reaching the peak of fossil fuels, and we don't have relevant alternative ene…
-
comment
Comment #35304804
I've had smartphones, too ;-). I sometimes clean the dust off the connector, it helps. And then it is a problem that the connectors tend to break. But is the solution really to des…
-
comment
Comment #35303414
Right. I get that it is marginally more convenient (though I could imagine a stand on which you could plug your phone with one hand). Not sure if it's worth the wasted energy thoug…
-
comment
Comment #35303348
> But with wireless the human can drop the phone with the same level of "I'm done" as he can drop the keys. Making sure that it's aligned correctly, and that the cable hasn't gone …
-
story
Ask HN: What is the point of smartphone wireless chargers?
I get that manufacturers are happy to sell more crap, and consumers are happy to buy new shiny crap. And wireless chargers are more expensive than wires, so that's an incentive for…
-
comment
Comment #33328059
You mean the business people working for Slack/Discord, right? I don't get why a company would rely on Slack/Discord, given that those have access to their internal communications.…
-
comment
Comment #33328035
> It also benefits from p20 functionality. What's that? p20?
-
comment
Comment #33324494
Because your Slack preview is not loading random URLs, I suppose?
-
comment
Comment #33323926
What key problems do you mean? Does e.g. IRCv3 solve them?