Viewing profile — Zibulon
Zibulon
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 03, 2015, 4:21 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 12
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Zibulon
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #9098701
Just for the records, Grothendieck maybe "disappeared", but he also died a couple of months ago, it was all over the press...
-
comment
Comment #8943072
Why is an account needed for the demo??? That turned me off enough to give up. I am tired of having to create an account for everything and anything - and it makes managing passwor…
-
comment
Comment #8938177
IMHO, he doesn't have the technique to handle 80 lbs.
-
comment
Comment #8938148
I wouldn't worry about his bow weight. The trajectory of his arrow on one of outdoor shots show he is not even shooting 30 lbs. You can hold that as long as you want.
-
comment
Comment #8938137
Actually not so hard - below 30 meters, you can have that kind of accuracy with not too much effort IMHO - in recurve archery, we shoot only 3 arrows, on separate targets, starting…
-
comment
Comment #8938126
IMHO, he is shooting a bow that's too light for hunting or fighting. I'd say he shoots below 30 pounds, which works for what he does, but nothing else.
-
comment
Comment #8937166
Hunting at 70 yards? All the bowhunters at my club practice below 50 yards.
-
comment
Comment #8937156
Concur. Besides, he is probably shooting less than 30 lbs which is enough for his stunts, when you want to be shooting 70-80 lbs for hunting. Given his technique, I'd like to see h…
-
comment
Comment #8937139
Yes the arrow is slow, because the bows are not heavy, probably in the 25-30 lbs range.
-
comment
Comment #8937123
From the trajectory of one of his outdoor shots, IMHO, he shoots 25-30 lbs.
-
comment
Comment #8937113
He seems to be shooting a very light bow, from the trajectory of his arrow in one of the outdoor shots, and his technique probably wouldn't work very long for a heavier bow or more…
-
comment
Comment #8850902
Maybe that's too short sighted. Constantly rewriting code has a big cost. A huge cost actually. I see it at my work everyday: there is a pervasive (fashionable?) attitude that no c…
-
comment
Comment #8850737
Sounds to me that the real issue is either mission creep, or a bad programmer/designer who doesn't see that the "generic" piece of code now needs to be split into components? In my…
-
comment
Comment #8850685
I don't understand: I thought that flexbility and abstraction went together, rather than against each other.
-
comment
Comment #8850628
Or failure to generalize might hide a failure to abstract out properly.
-
comment
Comment #8850625
Weird. To make software more generic, I usually reduce the number of assumptions and edge case handling that goes in the APIs. If you start adding options to handle more cases, tha…
-
comment
Comment #8831083
The author is missing maybe the following point: when there will be multiple objects that need to move, and some of the move methods will require state, then it will be nice to enc…