Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — YEwSdObPQT

YEwSdObPQT

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 3:06 PM UTC
HN karma
316
Public activity
101 items

About YEwSdObPQT

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #30309072

    > No, it does not stop people from thinking that (and of course that is not what is made illegal). It stops them from publishing and spreading those thoughts, because that is what …

  2. comment
    Comment #30308897

    > Yeah well, or the opposite. No it isn't the opposite. Again the last 2 years has shown me by how government and media have responded to recent events proves it. I have seen riote…

  3. comment
    Comment #30301066

    I agree. I was playing devil's advocate to an extent. At the time Rails was the first modern MVC framework as we understand it. > Rails was highly productive,the problem is that th…

  4. comment
    Comment #30300751

    It ultimately depends at what scale. I think most people to be fair are talking about building a clone of what was present back in the mid 2000s. You could build a twitter clone th…

  5. comment
    Comment #30296803

    > Small amount? Yes. There is a small amount of these people in the Western world. I would estimate it as less than 1% of the total population. The state and the media want you to …

  6. comment
    Comment #30292628

    > That page is what I would definitely not characterize as a proper source Obfuscate the discussion with numbers when it entirely misses the point I was making. So I will spell it …

  7. comment
    Comment #30292175

    Small bit of additional JS defeats the point of doing it at all. The moment you end up having to go outside one of these things you end up with one problem or another. The fact of …

  8. comment
    Comment #30290612

    I am not a fan of these things. Much like big JavaScript frameworks whenever you need to do something outside of the mechanisms they provide things become very difficult very quick…

  9. comment
    Comment #30290372

    > If removing threats of violence is considered censorship, then the word "censorship" has no meaning. Think about it: how does censorship really occur? Do governments cast a magic…

  10. comment
  11. comment
    Comment #30290277

    Unless I am presented with some hard evidence (that isn't from the German state) then I find it hard to believe. It still doesn't justify curtailing individual liberties anyway.

  12. comment
    Comment #30290130

    > So can "they" openly say, that they think, you deserve to be robbed and assaulted? Yes > And for the sake of it, let "them" be a famous antifa influencer, so you can expect that …

  13. comment
    Comment #30290000

    > If you the idea is crap and it proved that it's crap by leading to genocide why would we award it any protection? Lots of communists say that the Soviet Union wasn't "real commun…

  14. comment
    Comment #30289795

    You are advocating for throwing the baby out with the bath water. > It's hard to seriously argue that this wouldn't happen, given Germany's post-WWII history. (Also I'm not sure wh…

  15. comment
    Comment #30289759

    > You don't think, there are limits to the things I should be allowed to say about you? No. The only concession I would consider is a call to violence if there is an real and immed…

  16. comment
    Comment #30289518

    > Do you really want people to stereotype all Germans as Nazis and Holocaust deniers? Because I'm pretty sure this is what would end up happening if the German government did not g…

  17. comment
    Comment #30289443

    [flagged]

  18. comment
    Comment #30289332

    So you don't know?

  19. comment
    Comment #30289314

    > It's ok because the thoughts they ban are not novel, they had their time and were thoroughly executed on. "Because it is not new it is okay". Sorry that isn't very convincing. Th…

  20. comment
    Comment #30289244

    > Yeah, like "all jews should be killed". Good thing. Do you think it stops them from thinking that? Because you made is illegal. It doesn't. > It prevents such things from being n…

  21. comment
    Comment #30289134

    So you are saying that the laws in place haven't worked?

  22. comment
    Comment #30289068

    So you aren't allowed to speak freely and they are controlling what people can and can't wear? So they do deny freedom of speech and freedom of expression to people that the govern…

  23. comment
    Comment #30288780

    > It’s not the American way but I’m quite ok with Germany doing this. Why? Germany has literally criminalised thinking the wrong things and denies people to associate freely based …

  24. comment
    Comment #30276804

    Maybe. I get your point. I saw the clip of her on Bill Marr's show that has been floating around. She has pushed back when it was safe to do so. The tide was already turning on tha…

  25. comment
    Comment #30273604

    It has been in a nose dive for "everyday" people. But there is a whole section of society where they are treated as minor celebrities. The number of those people are shrinking (tha…