Viewing profile — Xudong
Xudong
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Apr 04, 2023, 9:33 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 80
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Xudong
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40563107
Fact-checking is really hard. How do you know what sources are reliable? How to balance or compare contradict evidences? We don’t have a clear answer yet. Therefore, instead of mak…
-
comment
Comment #40067811
This past week has been transformative since Loki went open source. We're thrilled by the progress and eager to share our development plan. Thanks to your input, we have enhanced t…
- story
-
comment
Comment #39956105
I will take it as a compliment, lol. But I do hope ChatGPT or some agents could help me with this. Btw, our recent study on machine-generated text detection might be interesting to…
-
comment
Comment #39955020
Thanks for your feedback on the gif figure, swores! We will revise it soon.
-
comment
Comment #39954999
Hi siffland! Thank you for your feedback. We understand your concern about the potential confusion given the popularity of Grafana Loki in the logging space. When naming our projec…
-
comment
Comment #39954914
Thank you for your suggestions, axegon!!! We will definitely consider them and add the features in a future version shortly. Regarding the first version, we are currently working o…
-
comment
Comment #39954785
Hello vinni2, thank you for mentioning the paper. However, I noticed that it hasn't gone through peer review yet. Also, the paper suggests that fine-tuning may work better than in-…
-
comment
Comment #39954696
I apologize for any confusion caused earlier. The core components have been defined separately ( https://github.com/Libr-AI/OpenFactVerification/tree/main/fa... ) to make customiza…
-
comment
Comment #39954646
ahah thanks!
-
comment
Comment #39954634
I wholeheartedly agree on the necessity of linking fact-checking tools to credible sources. Currently, our team's expertise lies primarily in AI, and we find ourselves at a disadva…
-
comment
Comment #39954536
Yes, they are similar. Actually, our initial paper was presented around five months ago ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09000 ). Unfortunately, our paper isn't cited by the DeepMind p…
-
comment
Comment #39954451
Hi there, I agree that fact-checking is not something that current generative AI models can directly solve. Therefore, we decompose this complex into five simpler steps, which curr…
-
comment
Comment #39954376
Hi Der_Einzige, thanks for pointing out these two great datasets! We are currently working on including customized evidence sources internally and will definitely consider these tw…
-
comment
Comment #39954328
Thanks for your response. When discussing fact-checking capabilities, the key question is always: Can we guarantee that it will always offer the correct justification? While it's u…
-
comment
Comment #39951572
[flagged]
- story