Viewing profile — Tiberium

(Not quoting the article directly due to HN's auto AI filters) In "Common mistakes" this article first says not to add this record if you're not actually planning to sell the domai…

RFC: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc10023.html

I had not hit any guardrails with reverse engineering (as long as its not related to security) with GPT 5.5 or 5.6 Sol, so you should try those. At worst with Sol you might see the…

If you don't want to get cyber verified, you can try an open-weight model such as Kimi K3 for that, it has looser internal safety training.

For OpenAI's Cyber verification (the normal kind for Codex) you absolutely do not need any proof of cybersecurity work/authorization. They just use Persona for KYC + live selfie, a…

You don't need an invite only program to just have Sol checking for vulnerabilities in binaries or code. But yeah I've hit guardrails a few times when Sol was making PoCs for the v…

I had to register a second account because on my main one verification always failed, and when I contacted support they said that I've tried too many times and can't verify on that…

https://chatgpt.com/cyber is not new for OpenAI, and yes it's basically just KYC + likely some other invisible checks on your account, you don't to be a famous security researchers…

I prefer to keep my internet identities disconnected, sorry. If you don't believe me, you can try using Sol with cyber verification yourself, or send me a link to a repo that Sol c…

Isn't this literally what https://chatgpt.com/cyber and http://openai.com/form/enterprise-trusted-access-for-cyber are for?

The fact that HF had to resort to using GLM 5.2 to analyze the logs/payloads makes it look legitimate, at least for me. They would not say that they hit guardrails with the frontie…

In my personal experience Sol with cyber verification is extremely capable of finding vulnerabilities, and it works even with binaries if you have some kind of IDA/Ghidra CLI acces…

They actually did a detailed presentation at BlackHat about the HuggingFace incident, and events that led to it. https://youtube.com/watch?v=87DyyMV0kCY

To be honest with you, I think this is pointless. However hostile this might sound, the active userbase of HN seems to be extremely dismissive to the thought of LLM detectors and t…

Can you actually just do the test I explained? You seem to be basing your evaluation of Pangram on some old experiences. It's a very reliable service, used by research conferences …

Please try https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49212788

Those people should just try posting a big quote from the article to HN, and then see their comment get instantly flagged due to HN's AI detection (which might as well be Pangram) …

To anyone who's willing to do a short HN test, please see and try https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49212433 You're in for a nice surprise.

Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49212433 and try yourself. And Pangram has been confirmed to be working by reputable educational institution, too.

... Come on now. This is obviously because I quoted the LLM written parts from the article. Remove the quoted parts and try again. Do people not understand what LLM detectors do? A…

Okay, I have a test for you. It's a bit undocumented, but I'm pretty sure HN is using Pangram or a similar tool to auto flag AI written comments. Can you copy the entire text from …

I don't know if this website specifically did it, but a lot of other similar websites provide such services in a very bad way, for example base64encode.org and base64decode.org sen…

You are a fool if you really think that the linked text is human written. I interact with LLMs basically daily, it's incredibly easy to spot their default styles. And, honestly, yo…