Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — SparklingCotton

SparklingCotton

HN member
Joined
Mon, Apr 14, 2014, 11:25 AM UTC
HN karma
85
Public activity
27 items

About SparklingCotton

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #23624905

    I've used lens for years and years, but don't fully grok it. Who cares? Lens is also like category theory, you don't need to understand the details in order to use it.

  2. comment
    Comment #23177578

    Well of course they are using some sort of "lint" system and they know the reason. Why not give the information to the user? There is no need to use any manual labor here.

  3. comment
    Comment #23177553

    I'm in exactly the same situation. It's impossible to know what they are after and my extension has a fraction of the permissions that you have.

  4. comment
    Comment #23151571

    Many good reasons why this would work in Europe. - Logistics in Germany is awesome, and Amazon really doesn't have a leg up on the already existing logistics solutions there. - For…

  5. comment
    Comment #18959243

    Then at least make it free for off-peak hours.

  6. comment
    Comment #18959230

    In a simple tax system there aren't that many deductions. This is especially true for low-tax jurisdictions. If you want non-standard deductions, create a company and do normal acc…

  7. comment
    Comment #18959207

    Chile has both lower taxes and automatic taxation. In 2019 they will even have automatic taxation for small businesses based on the statistical average for the industry and various…

  8. comment
    Comment #18959170

    These reasons make no sense. - SSL certs are hilariously simple with Let's encrypt. - Pretending privacy is a non-issue by saying SSL has the same is stupid, and is it even true wi…

  9. comment
    Comment #17558437

    But even within a region, having corporations do private deals with the government is corrpution. You are not supposed to be able to get special privileges to your company to the d…

  10. comment
    Comment #17557879

    Amazing how your single data point lead you to that conclusion..

  11. comment
    Comment #17557843

    Apple should be forced to pay back 10x what they gained in this illegal deal. It's bleedingly obvious that it's illegal to be taxed differently than other companies. Paying back €1…

  12. comment
    Comment #17557800

    It should have been obvious to Apple that they were receiving illegal subsidies, given that they were taxed differently than other companies. "The Irish government agreed a deal wi…

  13. comment
    Comment #17557741

    > While it's certainly Apple's prerogative to play EU states off against each other to get the best deal It certainly IS NOT. When Apple "get's a deal" it is by definition market m…

  14. comment
    Comment #17557697

    Since the EU wants Google to stop within 90 days, I assume they can give them a fresh €4.5bn fine if they refuse. At least that's something.

  15. comment
    Comment #17557660

    That's a good reason why fines (like what Google is getting) should be huge. It's deliberate to kill competition while not being in a dominant position, and then when in a dominant…

  16. comment
    Comment #17557631

    But what you can do as a user is not really relevant. I cannot change the defaults in an Android phone and sell it to you. That's the problem.

  17. comment
    Comment #17557603

    I don't see this reasoning at all. The fine is because Google is illegally cementing it's position as a dominant search engine through licensing of the android platform. Where is t…

  18. comment
    Comment #17557588

    Yes Google (if that's what you mean by Android) does "block" having Bing as the pre-installed search engine.

  19. comment
    Comment #17557547

    Monopolies are not illegal, so your argument is irrelevant.

  20. comment
    Comment #17557454

    > If the EU wants to preserve any credibility .. It's the other way around. EU is building credibility that seems to be lacking elsewhere by penalizing anti-competitive behavior.

  21. comment
    Comment #9900117

    Then why did you call your variables x and y, and not y and x? Surprise: because there IS a semantic meaning to the order. The haskell variable naming convention is bad. What is wo…

  22. comment
    Comment #9900085

    But "real memory" is neither what C presents or the copy semantics that is used in FP. The CPU will keep memory in 64-byte cache lines. There is a complex bus protocol to shuffle c…

  23. comment
    Comment #7585615

    No it simply does not, because the language forces you to write pure functions. The type system invites you to express invariants. There are very fundamental connections between st…

  24. comment
    Comment #7585600

    What you say can easily be disproved, and you are simply asking for too much if you ask for something to be a drop-in replacement for OpenSSL. Some re-architecting is requred simpl…

  25. comment
    Comment #7585570

    There is a "just use X". If you code in a language where you can express the invariants in your code, and make the compiler check those invariants, then your code is immune to all …