Viewing profile — SomeStupidPoint
SomeStupidPoint
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 17, 2015, 5:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,326
- Public activity
- 1,485 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About SomeStupidPoint
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #15849120
As I've said before, you'll have to ban me then, if you really believe I'm a negative contribution. I'm not going to stop responding in reasonable, human, and direct ways to commen…
-
comment
Comment #15849087
Could you tell me what personal attack that would be?
-
comment
Comment #15847982
I actually outlined why I thought they were wrong, and shut your mouth is clearly attached to not making subjective statements about other people's belongings (which, I absolutely …
-
comment
Comment #15847919
That you disagree with my assessment that angry lead-ins to detailed responses to people insulting your things are appropriate, but feel insulting other people's belongings (while …
-
comment
Comment #15847475
Firstly, shut your mouth -- you have no business telling me that my computers "suck" when they serve my needs. It doesn't suck and is one of the most pleasant machines I own due to…
-
comment
Comment #15844123
The second part of your example is a statement of opinion, not fact -- so it's not really the same thing at all.
-
comment
Comment #15844049
I run full Windows 10 on a tablet (dual core, 2GB RAM), and it's pretty amazing to me how many websites that have no reason to run slow completely fail on it. I can only imagine it…
-
comment
Comment #15843634
Excellent blog post! And if anyone is looking for the book (like I was), this seems to be a more recent edition (with better availability): https://www.amazon.com/How-Talk-Kids-Wil…
-
comment
Comment #15841683
Society is not a force of nature such that its decrees carry the weight of natural law. People can (and often should) resist what society decrees, because it's only through that dy…
-
comment
Comment #15841658
Sure, if you force people to behave a certain way, the conflict can be avoided. The problem stems from the fundamental fact that a very small percentage of people are assholes, a f…
-
comment
Comment #15840022
> [Subordinates] are used to being dominated and condescended. If you talk to them as respected individuals, you usually get respect back. It also gives more weight to the times yo…
-
comment
Comment #15839693
I agree, but poking holes in why they're excluded is important, because it let's you have this exchange -- "You can't argue with the math!" "Well, hold on now, I think you left a w…
-
comment
Comment #15839571
> They have relatives, friends, aesthetic preferences, social obligations, religious beliefs, and other things that "do not compute" in mathematical models. They compute fine -- mo…
-
comment
Comment #15839537
I think it takes less than most of us imagine -- but more than most of us are capable of organizing. If you wanted to build complexes to stimulate the economy, you'd probably need …
-
comment
Comment #15836382
> Integrity is always an option, but it's definitely not always an easy option. Here's some anecdata: I've been that shitbag without integrity, it's not actually any easier. (I act…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #15835689
People have been trying that, for at least a few decades. Do facts like almost every American wants a more fair system change it? No, because the governing structure has itself bee…
-
comment
Comment #15832593
> We frequently receive reports from community activists and other social media users who were blocked from commenting on an agency’s Facebook page, or prevented from contributing …
-
comment
Comment #15831904
> If you were correct, then women should have economic parity with men. They don't. Every statistic I've seen seems to indicate that modulo life choices that seem correlated with g…
-
comment
Comment #15831781
Late reply, but I think there's a second harm to throwing out generalists in addition to what you outline: Specialists aren't as good as generalists at integrating the work of spec…
-
comment
Comment #15823756
If you look at per energy expenditure, I'd argue that "webcams for pets" or "delivery for X" are probably delivering more value per unit energy used, because of relative efficiency…
-
comment
Comment #15822040
I think the implication is that "free" is being quoted from elsewhere and the author doesn't necessarily agree that it is without cost just because such cost is not denominated in …
-
comment
Comment #15814942
So Google deployed malware against... tens of millions of people?... in order to steal confidential data for profit, by bypassing security mechanisms on those devices as they inter…
-
comment
Comment #15814855
That was connecting on to the previous paragraph, and contrasting with pre-authorization through a payment network -- I meant a direct transfer of currency from customer to merchan…
-
comment
Comment #15813229
Digital currency isn't competing with credit card networks, it's competing with ACH. ACH transfers take days; wire transfers take minutes to hours and cost tens of dollars. There's…