Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ShrinkingWild

ShrinkingWild

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 19, 2018, 12:32 PM UTC
HN karma
14
Public activity
26 items

About ShrinkingWild

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #21311905

    There's no force involved here, this is just Basecamp being upset they now have to pay Google for what they do. Basecamp made a value judgement that the value google provides throu…

  2. comment
    Comment #20684084

    I've never understood this, all economic transactions are voluntary, who am I (or in this case, you) to tell people they can't make that decision? People who make bad decisions sho…

  3. comment
    Comment #19927605

    The idea that all the insurance companies would go bust at the same time is laughable, it's a hypothetical with no basis. Even taking your hypothetical though, my opinion remains u…

  4. comment
    Comment #19927384

    Its abhorrent to me that you think the "social good" is a good enough reason to violate the rights of the individual. Access to food is a social good, but we don't say we should ha…

  5. comment
    Comment #19927322

    I don't reconcile that distinction, it's based on the false premise that you do have the right to the provision of electricity. I don't agree with that on the same premise as healt…

  6. comment
    Comment #19919911

    This is likely the core of our disagreement; Healthcare is not essential, it's a luxury that has been afforded to us by those who were willing to study and learn how to do it in an…

  7. comment
    Comment #19919534

    Only if you're enforcing the "livable" wage. Those people who would be working for under your "livable" wage would still be out of that money though.

  8. comment
    Comment #19919094

    No one would, uber would be forced to either pay higher or go out of business due to a lack of supply in drivers. As it stands though, supply of drivers way outweighs demand for dr…

  9. comment
    Comment #19919004

    I don't agree that that is unacceptable, regardless of what "we as a society" have deemed. The consumers being held to account for their own business dealing is the reality of the …

  10. comment
    Comment #19918820

    Parent mentioned it would have to be the case, it doesn't have to. If it makes you feel any better replace it with "shouldn't" in your head.

  11. comment
    Comment #19918409

    Those people lose their money. I can't think of a good reason why they'd expect to get that money back, they were paying for a service that was being provided up until the company …

  12. comment
    Comment #19918058

    >It would be great until there was a hard year and the insurance companies would have the be bailed out by the taxpayers. Surely that wouldn't be the case? They wouldn't have to be…

  13. comment
    Comment #19917953

    Surely they "dance to the tune" because in reality their work just isn't worth enough to allow them that freedom of choice? That's hardly Ubers fault and I don't see why Uber shoul…

  14. comment
    Comment #19867477

    Yes, that's exactly what I mean, they're part of the market whether you like it or not and so they created a market desire for DRM in browsers. DRM isn't inherently evil, it's an a…

  15. comment
    Comment #19857202

    In the case of DRM, chrome is fulfilling a market desire that firefox had to follow suit with once the companies that adopted it realised their desire could be fulfilled. This is a…

  16. comment
    Comment #19851435

    Can you name an actual example of this happening or are you stuck with hypotheticals? Because my version can go very different to yours and with no concrete examples that your hypo…

  17. comment
    Comment #19850771

    Nazis also drank water and some probably even had pets. A lot of things started because people have said bad things, a lot of things also haven't started even though some people sa…

  18. comment
    Comment #19850188

    I mis-worded my comment there so this misunderstanding is my fault. I meant the definition you provided is used to leverage government regulation and in fact your Quora link is exa…

  19. comment
    Comment #19848986

    Back in its day, yeah. Then Microsoft got sued for providing it free with their OS instead of people having to wait for a long download or buying a browser . Internet explorer didn…

  20. comment
    Comment #19848639

    Yes, Google promoted themselves on their own services, what's the problem with that? The influence gained from their prowess in web search was legitimate, I don't see a problem wit…

  21. comment
    Comment #19848499

    I think the main difference here is that the nazi's were actually doing bad things as well as saying bad things. In this case, bar the rare exception by individuals, these are peop…

  22. comment
    Comment #19848391

    What resources have chrome monopolised to prevent other browsers from being provided? If chrome is a monopoly, why can I just go download firefox or opera or internet explorer? Chr…

  23. comment
    Comment #19848297

    Disagreement with a particular provider or producers actions within the free market is not equal to disagreement with the free market in general. AFAIK Gab isn't calling for regula…

  24. comment
  25. comment