Viewing profile — ScottHanson

Practice makes perfect.

The original article has nothing of interest in it.

Randinistas! A question. Did Roarke have the moral or legal rights to destroy the development after the owners changed the design?

You first!

The point of the blog is the question: do the successful at least part of their success to the society they grew up in. Ayn Rand says no; Gladwell says yes.

Rand's vilification of people who disagree with her is irritating, but what's more troublesome is the victim mentality that goes along with it. Inevitably the protagonist (who is h…

How so?

"As for the article being garbage, I appreciate where the author is coming from, but it's not insightful enough to warrant a link. Not to say it won't stir up the Objectivists here…

Apple is for faggs only.

It's only a garbage article if you're a fanatical Rand groupie. The post contributes to an important societal debate over whether or not the successful owe anything back to society…