Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — SKILNER

SKILNER

HN member
Joined
Fri, Mar 20, 2015, 2:09 AM UTC
HN karma
232
Public activity
57 items

About SKILNER

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48778219

    Thanks for providing some actual facts.

  2. comment
    Comment #48387440

    So many people flailing around to justify their feelings rather than thinking rationally.

  3. comment
    Comment #48181189

    It is time to give up arguments without evidence.

  4. comment
    Comment #48024002

    Disappointing - not a very insightful list

  5. comment
    Comment #47062284

    If you've ever undertaken the task of documenting entire workflows, then you know that you quickly put up the white flag at the word "entire". When you actually talk to people abou…

  6. comment
    Comment #46233035

    This strikes me as a very solid methodology for improving the results of all AI coding tools. I hope Anthropic, etc take this up. Rather than converging on optimal code (Occam's Ra…

  7. comment
    Comment #45066605

    "According to the study, AI still struggles with several crucial facets of coding: sweeping scopes involving huge codebases, the extended context lengths of millions of lines of co…

  8. comment
    Comment #45066554

    >> It reeks of cope. haha, well said, I've got to remember that one. HN is a smelly place when it comes to AI coping.

  9. comment
    Comment #44962945

    That's an excellent job of teaching - thank you!

  10. comment
    Comment #44173121

    You get to keep your job instead of being replaced by someone willing to use the latest tools.

  11. comment
    Comment #44173017

    It's a good idea to think of a converse situation, but this is a bad example. The constraint was not about technology but about budget, perceived benefits and political will.

  12. comment
    Comment #44167081

    Let's just imagine we're critiquing cars or planes in about 1910. They're so flawed. No one can say with certainty whether or how they will improve. Side note of interest, from Wik…

  13. comment
    Comment #44131866

    There's a lot of resistance to AI amongst the people in this discussion, which is probably to be expected. A chunk of the objections indicate people trying to shoehorn in their old…

  14. comment
    Comment #43879627

    Is the UX of the name any indication of the UX of the product?

  15. comment
    Comment #40512896

    I think this was more comprehensively described by The (Eight) Laws of Software Evolution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehman%27s_laws_of_software_ev... This subject always remin…

  16. comment
    Comment #40456213

    Great idea, thanks for doing this. But - why is the most important information, the title, in such a light, hard to read, font? The title should stand out, not the comments count e…

  17. comment
    Comment #38817479

    I don't understand the glee so many people have over this. I love being able to use Generative AI tools. How is it different than if I asked a person to draw these pictures for me?…

  18. comment
    Comment #37565475

    I gave a presentation many years ago to a software process group in Silicon Valley entitled, "Unsolved Problems of Software Maintenance". The problems are all still there. Having d…

  19. comment
    Comment #36748557

    That's an awesome site. What tools did you use?

  20. comment
  21. comment
    Comment #34295380

    What this completely overlooks is the time developers spend trying to understand existing code. For greenfield development that is close to zero. For maintenance work it is over ha…

  22. comment
    Comment #33881617

    Gray goo - "Self-replicating nanobots are going to cover the world in gray goo." This was the prediction about nanotechnology that has so far not come to pass. However, these gener…

  23. comment
    Comment #33364788

    > pearl clutching Says it all

  24. comment
    Comment #32765641

    Haha, me too, I read that sentence and closed the tab.

  25. comment
    Comment #32599484

    Headline: Too many Americans living where they choose to live.