Viewing profile — RomanKuzmenko

Hmm. Indeed that makes a lot of sense to use wasm instead. Let’s table the language aside for a moment. What data format would you expect to be spit out by third-party models? Is t…

I wonder myself why would we run third party Python scripts that can do anything, run an infinite loop, download something from Internet or delete files from the home folder, and k…

Of course! There is more than one concept that has value. And each concept also has a price (or price range as there will always be multiple implementations of each concept, each i…

I reread the sub-thread and I can see how my attention got carried away from the topic. The maintenance of models might be perceived as an add on to a much more scientific-heavy CA…

Users who want to continue paying for the value of having all tools under one roof can continue doing so. From time to time they might not be opposed to the idea of importing a par…

Thanks for the link. I’ll definitely study that. I’m not sure at the moment whether NopSCADlib has exactly the same ambitions or not. But it certainly deserves to be learned from. …

Yeah, it did steal some of my time and gave me some gray hair too. However as I mentioned in another comment, PartCAD is not there to replace existing CAD tools. It’s there to exte…

That’s why I said other CAD tools can be used for some workflows. For most humans interacting with technology nowadays out there FreeCAD will do. Anyway, even if I’m wrong about Fr…

I believe you mentioned two orthogonal features. 1) Import/export from CAD tools. Absolutely. That’s one of the main goals. PartCAD will be the persistence layer for parts I create…

I personally don’t think FreeCAD needs an alternative. It’s good enough for most needs and it’s maturing. But it needs to be used for what it is good for: visual workflows. FreeCAD…

Thanks for the attention to PartCAD and all the contextual information shared in this thread. It was just the initial version released a couple days ago. It doesn’t even match the …