Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — RashadSaleh

RashadSaleh

HN member
Joined
Fri, Apr 17, 2020, 2:00 PM UTC
HN karma
-4
Public activity
19 items

About RashadSaleh

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #23737845

    What about every individual person being responsible for what they say and do? There is no scheme where this responsibility can be shifted to someone else. Would you do it? Would y…

  2. comment
    Comment #23638252

    definitions: equality of opportunity = x equality of outcome = y equation: y = f(x, [z1, z2, ...]) where z1, z2, ... are possibly other factors determining y you seem to say that y…

  3. comment
    Comment #23638065

    Can we have some numbers here?

  4. comment
    Comment #23457685

    And the best one of those morals is the conviction to follow the law impartially.

  5. comment
    Comment #23457602

    It is right that democracy cannot cast moral judgement on people who reject it. In this sense it is like a mathematical postulate -- you either accept it or reject it, and if you r…

  6. comment
    Comment #23453960

    In a democracy, and if the orders don't break any laws, then yes you follow the orders, and you are not considered responsible for the outcomes. If you can't do it, you resign or a…

  7. comment
    Comment #23453907

    The highest ranking officer in a democracy is the president -- an elected civilian. This was not the case in nazi germany, and the military was forced to follow orders, regardless …

  8. comment
    Comment #23453841

    All disputes in a civil society must be resolved peacefully through elections and courts of law. Nobody can be above the law, for whatever reason. What you call morals is something…

  9. comment
    Comment #23448275

    International law does not really apply and is an ideal. The fact is that the state of the world order is anarchy: there is no president of the world or a parliament voted by all i…

  10. comment
    Comment #23448200

    What you call the moral imperative wasn't voted on, doesn't have a police to enforce it, doesn't have a judge to interpret it, doesn't have a media to debate it, and you just might…

  11. comment
    Comment #23448131

    And your neighbour thinks the same. And by the way they have a gun. In a civil society disagreements are solved peacefully through voting and clear structures of accountability so …

  12. comment
    Comment #23447684

    Sounds like a case of corruption. Military systems can be corrupt for the same reason that humans can be corrupt. Unfortunately, nobody found the magic wand yet, so we still have t…

  13. comment
    Comment #23447613

    I have mentioned this already folks. Nobody has the authority to break the law - not a general nor the president nor a judge nor a district attorney nor a member of parliament. A l…

  14. comment
    Comment #23446704

    All human beings are equal. There is no supreme arbiter of human argument. When you need to organize with fellow human beings, you then need to give people the benefit of a doubt a…

  15. comment
    Comment #23446655

    Very important point. It should be considered a cornerstone of democracy to have only voluntary drafting -- just like a free press and general elections.

  16. comment
    Comment #23446630

    I did mention that though but if you think it is stupid and/or immoral, the right thing to do is to still carry it out.

  17. comment
    Comment #23446603

    Also see the movie, A Few Good Men

  18. comment
    Comment #23446574

    From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_hierarchy "strict accountability – those who issue orders are responsible for the consequences, not those who carry them out" If you are…

  19. comment
    Comment #22899021

    I doubt that he actually said that but I could be wrong.