Viewing profile — LA_Banker
LA_Banker
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 29, 2014, 12:40 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 148
- Public activity
- 50 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About LA_Banker
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #16089377
Yes, OP seems to think the blockchain somehow solves the (extremely subjective) issue of valuation , as opposed to simply "did this transaction occur between counterparties?
-
comment
Comment #16089360
The automated clearing house system, our current means of settling payments, is pretty secure. The bigger threats are someone getting ahold of your credit card or checking account …
-
comment
Comment #16089299
Precisely.
-
comment
Comment #16089295
No. I support the blockchain and think it will be revolutionary. However, Enron's issues weren't attributable to some discrepancy between credits and debits. Accounting, surprising…
-
comment
Comment #16089258
Which only further demonstrates the gap between a 4-yr Comp Sci degree and software development. Which, don't get me wrong, I'm a university snob and think software engineers shoul…
-
comment
Comment #14516747
University CS courses tend to be heavy on varyingly useful theory, light on practical knowledge. Which, fine, that's like most university degrees even in the most vocational of fie…
-
comment
Comment #14516505
I'm ceaselessly amused by the folks fearing Amazon Echos or Google Homes as though they're constantly listening microphones sent to the NSA. As though we don't already carry device…
-
comment
Comment #14516018
This is interesting because while Apple's (comparative) dedication to privacy is endearing, it's a long-term existential threat. Google knows all about me and its assistant is, usu…
-
comment
Comment #12693480
I'm presupposing the contact card has their job position/title, and therefore still answers the question – also presupposing the original (odd) premise of wondering who someone alr…
-
comment
Comment #12693291
I don't see it as humblebragging (any of us could create a Cook contact / ReCode readers likely know Walt Mossberg's relationship to Apple) but, worse, a faulty premise. Odds are, …
-
comment
Comment #12416341
a16z is getting punished (at least, in the article) for marking their paper gains more conservatively than other funds. Their LPs are likely smart enough to realize this.
-
comment
Comment #12308449
I mentioned this to someone else who made the same point (albeit with the ACLU instead of the EFF): Hm, that's an interesting point that I'll have to noodle over. Thanks for pointi…
-
comment
Comment #12308438
Hm, that's an interesting point that I'll have to noodle over. Thanks for pointing it out.
-
comment
Comment #12293598
I'm not defending Gawker; I'm saying there's a better way to have this debate. We don’t have to accept or excuse Gawker’s worst stories to protest Thiel’s dangerous playbook for at…
-
comment
Comment #12293151
I don't think one needs to necessarily choose a side. I'm of the opinion that what Gawker did is wrong, but surreptitiously funding lawsuits to bankrupt the company is a perversion…
-
comment
Comment #12206527
My mistake, I misread. I edited my post to address this.
-
comment
Comment #12206513
You defend VA downthread while only decrying Gawker as being unethical. One takes photos of girls without their consent/knowledge while the other blurs the line of good journalisti…
-
comment
Comment #12206465
There's a certain, perverse form of cognitive dissonance in thinking what Gawker did to Hogan was wrong, but ViolentAcrez and his posting of creepshots of underage girls was someho…
-
comment
Comment #12206460
>and in fact was illegal for a long time Yeah, no. NYTimes v. Sullivan determined that public figures sacrifice a good deal of their privacy when they when they enter the public sp…
-
comment
Comment #12205415
An LBO of a home is called "getting a mortgage." And yet, one's car or home isn't exactly a share-issuing company. You can form a company to own it – but that's not private equity.…
-
comment
Comment #12205258
One doesn't exactly "start [their] own private equity firm." Tens of (more often: hundreds of) millions of dollars must be raised and even then, they must bid (or acquire by other …
-
comment
Comment #12205239
>At least they will do everything possible to maximize profits. Yes, sometimes this involves slower ambulances or slow internet. This is especially the case when there is no/few al…
-
comment
Comment #12205173
>However, conflating private equity with wall st., and making a distinction between how firms under private equity ownership behave vs. public equity or closely held (no financial …
-
comment
Comment #12198529
>Fair enough. But since when was the DNC officially a part of the US Federal Government? U.S. Law (U.S. Code or "U.S.C.") doesn't just cover the government. It covers, well, the U.…
-
comment
Comment #12198516
>Everybody that has spent more than 3 hours on the internet already knows that everyone is out there to get you. Yes, just like every adult knows thieves are out there to get to yo…