Viewing profile — Jordrok
Jordrok
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 09, 2015, 6:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 610
- Public activity
- 284 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Jordrok
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49077563
Reality does indeed have a well known liberal bias.
-
comment
Comment #46584641
There is no comparison between what this administration is doing and any that have come before it. Attempting to draw that false equivalence is just pure foolishness.
-
comment
Comment #46584117
> Are you saying the entirety of the DOJ apparatus could be politically steered to look for non-existent evidence or make frivolous referrals? Yes, absolutely and unquestionably. T…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #45421537
I remember being more astonished that it took so long for it to finally happen. If he hadn't been the president, he would have been banned ages earlier. Same exact thing with this …
- story
-
comment
Comment #41658346
> I'm glad, tho, that twitter does not allow this. It does though? That is exactly what blocking does both before and after this change.
-
comment
Comment #41658302
> In what other public, online discussion forum format can anybody without admin powers, arbitrarily and unilaterally ban others from publicly replying to public posts? That idea s…
-
comment
Comment #41632596
The point of blocking is to prevent harassment, no? Hiding the blocker's posts from the blockee puts up an additional barrier to interaction. Even if it can be circumvented, it sti…
-
comment
Comment #39870370
> Super-niche use-case: our game studio prototyped a multiplayer horror game where we played with cloning player voices to be able to secretly relay messages to certain players as …
-
comment
Comment #39611588
Oh get a grip. It's not even close to the same thing and you know it. > "though a number of them have already completed their sentences" And you have the gall to compare that mild …
-
comment
Comment #38704807
> but most humans can understand that people have different senses of humor I agree completely. And I would think that someone with greater than zero empathy would have a hard time…
-
comment
Comment #38704636
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_the_Author
-
comment
Comment #37653658
Holy crap, I played the game multiple times and had no idea those were even clickable until I saw this comment.
-
comment
Comment #35942550
> When Hillary called 1/2 of Trump supporters "deplorables" isn't that hate speech? No, it is unequivocally, objectively not hate speech. Nowhere in there is there a threat of viol…
-
comment
Comment #35551081
Assuming that most of what was in the article is true, then I guarantee that the government now knows exactly who the leaker is and has no need to contact the person who was the so…
-
comment
Comment #35548548
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be."
-
comment
Comment #35057282
I agree, but sadly it's getting harder and harder to do that sort of thing. It seems that almost inevitably, along with those fancy framework abstractions come tighter restrictions…
-
comment
Comment #34527405
Absolutely. Any other normal person would have had their account permanently banned with no recourse.
-
comment
Comment #34252394
This is exactly why I like to use a gaming keyboard with extra programmable function keys off to the left side. All the flexibility without having to override any default functiona…
-
comment
Comment #34132118
I think you're misunderstanding. The "myth" being referred to in that third link is that it's beneficial to warm up your engine by letting it idle for a long time. This was previou…
-
comment
Comment #34008848
So this is the kind of "free speech" that you get when conservative ideals meet reality, huh? How utterly unsurprising.
-
comment
Comment #33678168
The 2020 election got 150+ million. What's your point?
-
comment
Comment #33667461
This, exactly. Although I'm still convinced that at least 90% of cases where people complain about shadowbanning are nothing more than them being unable to handle the idea that oth…
-
comment
Comment #33500464
> and guess what, if you go to The Onion about page, it's pretty obvious they are satire. Obvious, yes, but not explicitly called out. That's kind of the point.