Viewing profile — IfOnlyYouKnew

[flagged]

No. With a court order, FISA always allowed surveillance of "agents of foreign powers", even if they were US citizens: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Intelligence_Surveilla.…

This is about foreign customers only, so as an attempt to abolish the constitution, it is severely flawed in respecting it enough to keep its distance. I can't think of any US serv…

Well some authoritarian regime would otherwise just do it whenever it got started, and it would require maybe a week?

I have all the love and appreciation in the world for enjoying a weekend spent in configuration files. But I feel the need to state the obvious: This is a long blog post ending wit…

In civil law, the roles of plaintiff and defendant are largely interchangeable. If you order food and don't like it, the restaurant might sue you for payment. Or you need to sue th…

They do risk mounting fines by continuing the practice.

This is civil law, not criminal. Presumption of innocence doesn’t apply.

“They’ve decided that picking the cotton is better than refusing to do so”. Edit, because people share a characteristic with heavy metals: the point is that a “choice” made under e…

A “secret blacklist” that’s been known forever, or at least for two years: https://twitter.com/dancow/status/1601017194456186881?s=20&t...

As I said, it’s debatable if the guy’s reach needed to be limited, the point you are arguing. What’s not debatable is that the breathless outrage-bait under discussion misrepresent…

Well, first of all, “tweets” don’t “trend”. Terms do. So this description feels off, already. Next, I wonder, but don’t care enough to look it up, if this guy is adequately summari…

I thought we’d gotten over this thing where people thing they appear smart because they copy & paste instead of using curl?

I feel like when you diss journalists, it should generally be for something they actually did wrong, not preemptively based on your imagination. If they are so terrible, there shou…

So… a federal jury found this guy guilty, but here we have a friend of his who is going to be totally neutral in a reevaluation? So they set out to describe it as „an accident“ bec…

The headline is bullshit. It’s one of dozens of possible measures, it’s a limit only on non-essential trips, and it’s included only in the worst of several levels, which is unlikel…

https://twitter.com/fabianstelzer/status/1598293297633501186... https://twitter.com/Carnage4Life/status/1598332648723976193?... (the third and last image, especially)

LOL, touch grass! You’re going off the shallow end.

WTF you’re just tone -policing after losing the argument now.

The tests sets are large enough to render this moot, as the confidence intervals are almost certainly smaller than the precisions typically reported, i. e. 0.1 %.

"They"?