Viewing profile — Gagarin1917
Gagarin1917
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 11, 2025, 3:08 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 257
- Public activity
- 140 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Gagarin1917
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49102840
No, no, I get that the general deal was public information. I’m not doubting that Anthropic partnered with SpaxeXAI for additional computer. I said as much in my original comment. …
-
comment
Comment #49091866
I’m not sure what you’re referencing, I can’t find any source for this. Why would they offer an 80% discount? Hardware is the limiting factor for many AI companies.
-
comment
Comment #49083847
I thought SpaceXAI was making like $25 billion a year renting out hardware now?
-
comment
Comment #49037567
What? What are you talking about? I’m clearly likening it to the subject of this thread: using government to create protectionist policies. 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs is a protect…
-
comment
Comment #49031483
> Maybe... maybe... if this were a discussion about only his protectionism on Chinese tech, yea, maybe you have a point. That is the discussion though… Too many people here are act…
-
comment
Comment #49031261
I mean, both sides do implement protectionist laws. Did we already forget about Biden raising tariffs on Chinese EVs to protect the auto industry & unions? I’m not sure you’re look…
-
comment
Comment #49031248
I don’t think there’s much reason to believe a Democrat or a different Republican would be less likely to implement protectionist laws. That’s kind of a reoccurring problem. Rememb…
-
comment
Comment #48901127
Any models that can understand thick accents better than I can? Anytime I’m talking to an Indian on the other end, I have to have them repeat everything 2 or 3 times.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48877882
If you’re worried about this why are you using a third party AI in the first place? Running any query in Claude or Codex could result in the AI reading/uploading any file in your c…
-
comment
Comment #48810634
Individual firms can cut jobs while the overall economy sees more of that job pop up. That’s what happens when individuals become more efficient, new projects become more economica…
-
comment
Comment #48787284
>You seem to think that non programmers don't ask LLMs to program for them. Because they largely do not. Are you actually under the impression that the average person is using chat…
-
comment
Comment #48782498
>LLM doesn't think You don’t realize I’m referring to the process of generating a ton of text in an attempt to better address the request - a process that these LLM companies call …
-
comment
Comment #48781715
That’s not true. The different use cases of LLMs objectively use different amounts of tokens. AI coding agents can parse half a dozen or more files on each request, plus use a ton …
-
comment
Comment #48781177
It doesn’t matter what “most people” are, coding agents use an obscene amount of tokens, literally millions per day. Every request to an agent needs to parse at least several diffe…
-
comment
Comment #48779224
No not at all
-
comment
Comment #48778883
But why if that costing anyone money? You can generate like 50 of that kind of thing using various chatbots throughout your day. You don’t need a pro account for emails.
-
comment
Comment #48778685
I’m not saying “It’s crazy to ever write emails with AI.” I’m saying it shouldn’t hardly cost any money, emails are not token intensive and most people could likely use the free ve…
-
comment
Comment #48778669
But surely the free version of any of the chatbots is enough to achieve that, right? You don’t need a Pro subscription for that.
-
comment
Comment #48778341
>And in coding specifically, the speedup is real and comes with its own bill. Oh so this article isn’t really about where AI spending is actually happening. I HOPE people aren’t sp…
-
comment
Comment #48728306
What website/service actually uses that?
-
comment
Comment #48711524
What?! It makes it look like a giant fighter jet
-
comment
Comment #48693882
Now?
-
comment
Comment #48652914
You think too highly of California voters. All they have to do if frame it as an unnecessary freedom that only conservatives and wackos want to keep and they will 100% support it. …
-
comment
Comment #48652865
They’re just waiting for the union to fall apart and then those will be next.