Viewing profile — EternalFury
EternalFury
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 03, 2012, 5:17 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 633
- Public activity
- 238 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About EternalFury
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49058906
Everyone is starting to express themselves as LLMs. I fell prey to having LLMs “copyedit” some of my words when I wanted to make sure I got my point across, but I am trying to stop…
-
comment
Comment #47674519
Public education is important. Without it, it’s harder to stay above average. But there are those who say “it is not my duty to fund the education of anyone else.” Hence, here we a…
-
comment
Comment #47649687
Yes, it’s contradictory to some degree. On purpose. That’s part of living it. My “advice” is also US-centric, where I have observed time and again what truly leads to one getting t…
-
comment
Comment #47646037
My advice is: Don’t let someone else control your life. Switch occupation every 2 years, even if you find a great environment. Don’t chase, for what you need must come to you. Unde…
-
comment
Comment #47573920
If somehow recovering the capex expenditure is not counted, if somehow the cost of developing future models is not counted, then yes, inference costs of current leading models allo…
-
comment
Comment #47562972
There are people who think knowledge discovery is just a matter of parroting past behavior and trying things at random until something sticks. I don’t.
-
comment
Comment #47524918
Force is supreme until you use it, then everyone knows it has limits.
-
comment
Comment #47524816
So…calculators are intelligent? How about accountants that failed arithmetic 101 in high-school, are they intelligent? Generally intelligent?
-
comment
Comment #47524793
We are jagged, but we can smooth that jaggedness if we choose to do so. LLMs stay jagged.
-
comment
Comment #47524766
The real question is: Can it be generated using programs? If it can be, then LLMs will eventually monkey type these programs.
-
comment
Comment #47499365
Yes. I doubt it can do that.
-
comment
Comment #47499317
I am thinking there’s a large category of problems that can be solved by resampling existing proofs. It’s the kind of brute force expedition machine can attempt relentlessly where …
-
comment
Comment #46118132
It does seem good, but it’s slow.
-
comment
Comment #44973154
I was going to say something, then I realized my cynicism is already at maximum.
-
comment
Comment #44972648
Is it just me or does it feel like billionaires of that ilk can never go broke no matter how bad their decisions are? The complete shift to the metaverse, the complete shift to LLM…
-
comment
Comment #44427820
They learn the value of specific actions in specific contexts based on the rewards they received during their play time. Specific actions and specific contexts are not transferable…
-
comment
Comment #44427719
100%
-
comment
Comment #44426323
What John Carmack is exploring is pretty revealing. Train models to play 2D video games to a superhuman level, then ask them to play a level they have not seen before or another 2D…
-
comment
Comment #43411933
Such a weird move. They must have too much cash because they are not buying GPUs from Jensen.
-
comment
Comment #43235554
It costs someone something, but no one their freedom. Mass ignorance is the opposite. As for degrees with no use, pretty sure these are the byproducts of education for profit, with…
-
comment
Comment #43234611
If anything in any country should be free, it should be education. And, obviously, the administration of education should never be a for-profit venture. Valuing democracy and being…
-
comment
Comment #43234547
Yes, you must be able to recognize the right answers and separate them from the hallucinations and crappy engineering. Maybe it’ll get to a point where even people who don’t have a…
-
comment
Comment #43018008
I have been doing this for 30 years now. The software industry is all about selling variations of the same stuff over and over and over. But in the end, the more software there is …
-
comment
Comment #43008101
Isn’t this equivalent to maximizing latent space activation without corrective user input? How does it implement self correction or backtracking?
-
comment
Comment #43007943
What’s the time and space complexity of the new approach?