Viewing profile — CircleSpokes
CircleSpokes
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 15, 2021, 8:59 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 251
- Public activity
- 71 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About CircleSpokes
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35846500
I think that would make sense yes. It isn't clear to me why they would distribute the private keys to the OEMs (laziness?).
-
comment
Comment #35846105
Intel gave it to MSI, but I may have been incorrect before. Apparently the keys was shared across multiple OEMs (at least that is how I read this below) >The leaked private keys af…
-
comment
Comment #35846065
I can't take people like you seriously. The anticheat isn't a backdoor. It doesn't ship with the operating system or come preinstalled in anyway. You opt into it when you play the …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #35845938
>People don’t care about the anticheat on their computer, they want it foisted on everyone else who plays, which is a sucky proposition for privacy and security minded people. No t…
-
comment
Comment #35845121
I don't think its absurd at all. It isn't required in anyway (opt in), lets you use your own keys (no preinstalled microsoft or other bigcorp keys), and isn't possible for someone …
-
comment
Comment #35845005
You are correct. Secure boot is not required to play valorant on windows 10.
-
comment
Comment #35844983
Anyone saying secureboot "brings absolutely nothing" clearly doesn't understand how secure boot works (or is just arguing in bad faith). Secure boot has issues (see key revocation …
-
comment
Comment #35844904
I honestly don't understand why people act like this. Wanting to be able to ensure firmware isn't maliciously modified is a good thing. Open firmware is also a good idea obviously …
-
comment
Comment #35844793
The keys are OEM specific. Intel gives them to MSI so they can sign their firmware/BIOS updates. Clearly MSI didn't handle them well.
-
comment
Comment #35820355
Except you can use your own keys? Nothing stops you from signing the stuff yourself (other comments in this thread link to a step by step guide!)
-
comment
Comment #35789164
Not only do they hide it under a group policy even when you enable an "Enhanced PIN" there is a maximum length of 20.
-
comment
Comment #35788568
It can work yes but AMD chips didn't get GMET until Zen2 so if you leave virtualization based protection on you might see a performance hit. From Microsoft's website: >Memory integ…
-
comment
Comment #35788532
IIRC it has more to do with that series of chip not having GMET (AMD Guest-Mode Execute Trap for NPT) which is used in Windows 10/11s virtualization based protection. Microsoft req…
-
comment
Comment #35755656
>Berkeley attempted this and it was recently overturned: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/court-overturns-berkeley-califo ... There is a legal difference between a state banning it and…
-
comment
Comment #35690787
> If people are not allowed to transfer money anonymously, why allow them communicate anonymously? You can do that in the US though with cash. There might be some transactions that…
-
comment
Comment #35660701
Acting on behalf of adversarial governments is fine too if you register with the government. In the case linked above they didn't do that and conspired to keep the fact they took o…
-
comment
Comment #35643194
Except people get arrested for sanction busting somewhat frequently..
-
comment
Comment #35381543
>Oh, so your advice is to blindly trust whatever they shovel into the public's mouths ? Are you being serious? By this time in history Libya had already established a history for t…
-
comment
Comment #35377749
Because real life isn't a TV show. That isn't how national security agencies work. They don't dump raw intelligence to the public. The US knew it was Libya obviously, and the data …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #35376828
What a ridiculous thing to say. Do you think the Libyan intelligence service gets to bomb dance clubs and then cry sovereignty when someone bombs some military targets in Libya? I …
-
comment
Comment #35192220
Now I know you are trolling. Employees forming a union isn't 'parasitizing' an existing one. It is clear you don't even understand the basics of what a union is or how it works. It…
-
comment
Comment #35190840
Nothing about forming a union is tone deaf. One doesn't have to be 'oppressed' to form a union. This isn't mocking anything.
-
comment
Comment #35190801
Forming a union isn't entitled. Nothing is wrong with forming and joining a union. Your post is frankly ridiculous.