Viewing profile — CaptainFever
CaptainFever
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jan 09, 2023, 10:56 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,154
- Public activity
- 787 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About CaptainFever
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49045598
That's a nice xenophobic fantasy. There's a reason why border guards are known for their power trips.
-
comment
Comment #49036877
It exists. Search up POW blocker or Anubis blocker extensions.
-
comment
Comment #49031203
What if I was an active member, and voted no?
-
comment
Comment #49031167
> Why were your projects no longer welcomed at Codeberg? > Oh, I see. Well I won’t be installing this then. > Very illuminating. Man, talk about anti-social. What a bad faith quest…
-
comment
Comment #48380101
We'll see if you're right, and if HNers can redeem themselves. I'm not holding out much hope, though.
-
comment
Comment #48379627
It's sad that the outrage posts got hundreds of comments while this article, from the maintainer explaining the CVEs and test suites, only has this singular comment and is already …
-
comment
Comment #48291001
If a meatbag uses this word in public, they're rightly going to get punched. It's not their word to claim. Is there any wonder the word has become associated with slavery and racis…
-
comment
Comment #48253798
Boo! Cheer! Boo! Cheer! https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/331b0df7-02f2-4c5f-add8-fe...
-
comment
Comment #48136307
It's been polled. > First reported in the 2023 AI Index, significant regional differences in AI optimism persist. A large majority believe AI-powered products and services offer mo…
-
comment
Comment #48072623
local models exist
-
comment
Comment #48071684
That exists! Check out Hoardy Web. https://oxij.org/software/hoardy-web/ Its whole point is undetectable archiving because it just saves what your browser already sees.
-
comment
Comment #48049898
People are unhappy with Anubis because it's not designed to stop "AI crawlers", despite marketing as such. It's designed to stop DDoS attacks on layer 7. Anyone who pays the comput…
-
comment
Comment #48004537
Why not?
-
comment
Comment #47959310
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #47901383
Who reads the ToS anyway?
-
comment
Comment #47846586
> AI by its very nature removes attribution. This is incorrect. RAG preserves attribution. Training data doesn't, but it doesn't make sense to attribute that anyway, unless you wan…
-
comment
Comment #47846562
Website-crawling services tend to have better luck accessing these websites due to their experience solving CloudFlare's challenges. Might want to try those.
-
comment
Comment #47731596
There's probably value in a web extension that uses a small embedded LLM to filter out comments that complain about literally any AI that's used in the submission. To make it reall…
-
comment
Comment #47670061
^ This is a troll; new account, troll username.
-
comment
Comment #47642232
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #47391395
You could have government-signed models + programs that are approved for generating CP (not CSAM). It's legal if the signature checks out. Something like https://contentauthenticit…
-
comment
Comment #47288274
This reminds me of a voting method I've seen some anarchists advocate for: the rules passed by votes should only be enforced on those who voted for it.
-
comment
Comment #47204529
Rude.
-
comment
Comment #47204476
We really need to add "please don't write comments witch-hunting articles for AI usage" into the guidelines at this rate
-
comment
Comment #44768902
"Information wants to be free, as long as it's not my information."