Viewing profile — 995533
995533
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Dec 20, 2018, 3:09 AM UTC
- HN karma
- -1
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 995533
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18774181
Oh, baby don't hurt me. Don't hurt me. No more.
-
comment
Comment #18772757
Thanks. I think you are a correct exception to what I said. I should have known that using words like "nobody" would not go over well on HN (but tedious to type "a very large perce…
-
comment
Comment #18772554
It was not possible to increase speed by getting more powerful compute?
-
comment
Comment #18772389
I would not retrain such a model on all data, just do online updates. Also I still think for that use case training times and latency are negligible (nobody cares or nobody notices…
-
comment
Comment #18772324
Nobody in business cares if you are doing proper AI or dumb curve fitting. What matters is the complexity (engineering debt) and performance (accuracy, robustness). Online learning…
-
comment
Comment #18772276
If you are building large-scale systems that take weeks or months to train, you are at a point where you shouldn't care about this. Throw more compute at the problem, it will pay f…
-
comment
Comment #18771091
Nobody cares how long it takes to train a model. What matters is prediction speeds, which are comparable (and NLP less likely to require high frequency, where a few more millisecon…
-
comment
Comment #18755152
Ibuprofen may cause ulcers, bleeding, or holes in the stomach or intestine.
-
comment
Comment #18730368
Something can be possible, while still technically not feasible. I agree our knowledge currently is lacking, but see no reasons why this will never catch up. There are fundamental …
-
comment
Comment #18726723
You are correct, in that AI experts may not be the best predictors for AGI. For one, they spend their lives working towards the goal of AGI, so it would require a huge amount of co…
-
comment
Comment #18726467
Clearly, AGI-level intelligence is possible, because human brains exist. So unless you pose that a function has to rely on its materialization (there is something untouchably magic…
-
comment
Comment #18726360
Shane Legg (co-founder DeepMind) and Marcus Hutter (Schmidhuber pedigree) defined machine intelligence in this canonical paper from 2007: https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3329 > Universa…
-
comment
Comment #18722374
Your reasoning does not follow. To see why, take something humans already clearly created: Flight. Kerosene-type jet fuel propulsion has not been observed in nature. It is flight n…
-
comment
Comment #18722241
If AGI is possible, it already happened. If even AI experts put it a 100-1000 years out, where some human monkeys banging on digital typewriters could eventually create it, then, i…