Viewing profile — 2019-nCoV
2019-nCoV
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 8:57 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 157
- Public activity
- 188 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About 2019-nCoV
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #23436358
The more macro the more inaccurate.
-
comment
Comment #23357860
Where were the riots after white woman Justine Damond was brutally killed by a black police officer in Minneapolis just a few years back? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_…
-
comment
Comment #23356798
The local forces failed (rather told to stand down) in Minneapolis. You really think they'd let the city just burn to the ground before bringing federal agencies?
-
comment
Comment #23347322
Who invested the power in you to decide what the reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous sentence is? There have already been many shootings across the country in the past few ho…
-
comment
Comment #23347290
And they're not fact checking Biden.
-
comment
Comment #23347237
Where does it unequivocally say that?
-
comment
Comment #23347228
It doesn't unequivocally say that at all. It can reasonably be interpreted as: "once people are willing to break the law and start looting, it's not long before there are also peop…
-
comment
Comment #23347204
How is that glorifying violence?
-
comment
Comment #23346248
Stop trying to protect criminals.
-
comment
Comment #23345352
Upholding the bedrock of democracy. The EO spells out the reasoning: https://kateklonick.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/DRAFT-EO-...
-
comment
Comment #23343760
Where have Fox News editorialised users content?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #23343705
Exactly. Politics is the mind killer. Would they have the same opinion if Twitter was a right-leaning Trump-mouthpiece that was disproportionately quelling left-leaning voices? Tak…
-
comment
Comment #23343623
If you're intellectually honest and advocate for a system that controls people, turn over the keys to your enemies for a dry run.
-
comment
Comment #23343542
> If the intent is to punish critics and suppress the speech of party opponents, then yes. Any authoritarian can justify their actions in abstract and general terms, but context ma…
-
comment
Comment #23335134
Seppuku.
-
comment
Comment #23334802
HN does not editorialise and haphazardly censor.
-
comment
Comment #23334773
Backing down to who? It becomes US law.
-
comment
Comment #23334729
Akin to banning cigarette advertising, this will free up many millions in the war against misinformation. Would absolve Twitter from any future calls for debunking/censorship. Can'…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #23332090
Who fact checks the fact checkers?
-
comment
Comment #23330713
They excel at bad decisions. This person is the “head of site integrity” at Twitter: https://twitter.com/LevineJonathan/status/126545757821512499...
-
comment
Comment #23330429
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.
-
comment
Comment #23330336
A great place to see what lies ahead for a divisive society
-
comment
Comment #23330281
Open a history book.