Viewing profile — 0x01

Thanks for this. I've read that post before, and back then I just took the explanation to mean we're dropping the UI . I can see now that was not the meaning. > we need developers …

maybe I should have said supposed to be human readable. I share your sentiment. I saw a comment on here once justifying that claim by saying something along the lines of "but if yo…

I was keeping a close eye on Eve until it changed direction from programming for everyone to yet another lisp . Is there any writeup/discussion on why this happened? I do like lear…

Please can you tell me how I can verify whether my details have been leaked? I've recently purchased a domain from namecheap, with whoisguard, and if I recall correctly I didn't ha…

Ah, this explains why running a file on the .o file said it was lua bytecode. This feature of luajit makes it much more appealing. Thanks for the info!

Thank you for the info!

That's a neat trick! Is there any reason you can't do this with luac? I tried the equivalent to what you're doing with luac, but gcc complains that "member libmylib.a(luafunc.o) in…

Apologies. I should have referenced Lua 5.3 instead as it has both integer and bitwise operator support. This should satisfy the concerns regarding crypto implementation. As for th…

If we accept that C is here to stay for the time being, but is difficult to manage memory, then why don't we use a mid-way solution? Lua is built on c, and is much more (than C) me…

You're right of course, I definitely do not want to do that. But I know I would vote individually on the issues that I care about. For example, if everybody had a say, SOPA wouldn'…

No. I've never voted, not once. I do not believe I live in a democracy, even though that's what we're calling it. I believe that by voting I'm validating a broken system. Who are a…