Show HN: Bocker – Docker implemented in 100 lines of bash
1–10 of 89 posts
Re: Show HN: Bocker – Docker implemented in 100 lines of bash
#2Re: Show HN: Bocker – Docker implemented in 100 lines of bash
#3The network, PID and mount namespaces are the ones unshared, plus a private /proc.
I like tools like this because they're reality checks on how the basics of Linux containers are just a few essential system calls, and particularly that they're limited.
Re: Show HN: Bocker – Docker implemented in 100 lines of bash
#4it might be interesting to see a version of your script using overlayfs
Re: Show HN: Bocker – Docker implemented in 100 lines of bash
#5Re: Show HN: Bocker – Docker implemented in 100 lines of bash
#6Re: Show HN: Bocker – Docker implemented in 100 lines of bash
#7not sure if you ever saw this - https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=CoreOS-B... it might be interesting to see a version of your script using overlayfs
I'll have to look info CoreOS's reasons for going with Ext4.
Re: Show HN: Bocker – Docker implemented in 100 lines of bash
#8Nice work. Great to see the advanced features of BTRFS put to use.
Re: Show HN: Bocker – Docker implemented in 100 lines of bash
#9Using btrfs subvolumes as the image format, that's a nice touch. On the same road as the hypothetical systemd packaging system (not that I'm very enthusiastic about that). The network, PID and mount namespaces are the ones unshared, plus a private /proc. I like tools like this because they're reality checks on how the basics of Linux containers are just a few essential system calls, and particularly that they're limi…
it feels like most of them build large products around things to justify making money, while i like the simple, elegant, easy to verify little pieces of software (some call it "the unix way")
unshare and iproute are pretty decent for ex.