Australian Government Green-Lights Internet Filter
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Australian Government Green-Lights Internet Filter
#2Wouldn't a VPN get around this easily?
Re: Australian Government Green-Lights Internet Filter
#3When this is in place, Australia will have the complete three: Slow Internet, Severly Limited Competition, and Strict Internet Filtering/Anti-Piracy Laws. Seems like the impossibly high cost of media in this country can only go up.
Re: Australian Government Green-Lights Internet Filter
#4Wouldn't a VPN get around this easily?
I already have a maximum download speed of about 600kb/s, if I had a VPN between my network and the internet would it not become almost un-useably slow?
Re: Australian Government Green-Lights Internet Filter
#5Wouldn't a VPN get around this easily?
I already have a maximum download speed of about 600kb/s, if I had a VPN between my network and the internet would it not become almost un-useably slow?
You could download things into a seedbox and then download from there at your current 600kb/s. Essentially you're renting a server dedicated to downloading things.
E:
Browsing would be slower. Although there are a lot of pay-for VPN's that work quickly. Also I don't think downloading torrents should be effected at all.
Re: Australian Government Green-Lights Internet Filter
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
I already have a maximum download speed of about 600kb/s, if I had a VPN between my network and the internet would it not become almost un-useably slow?
You could download things into a seedbox and then download from there at your current 600kb/s. Essentially you're renting a server dedicated to downloading things. E: Browsing would be slower. Although there are a lot of pay-for VPN's that work quickly. Also I don't think downloading torrents should be effected at all.
I'm actually less concerned with the piracy aspect, I primarily use Spotify and Netflix. I'm more concerned with how attempting to filter the internet may a) further reduce the already dismal speeds and b) become a common tactic for blocking objectionable content as a sort of stand in for the failed 2013-2014 internet filter legislation.
Re: Australian Government Green-Lights Internet Filter
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could download things into a seedbox and then download from there at your current 600kb/s. Essentially you're renting a server dedicated to downloading things. E: Browsing would be slower. Although there are a lot of pay-for VPN's that work quickly. Also I don't think downloading torrents should be effected at all.
I'm actually less concerned with the piracy aspect, I primarily use Spotify and Netflix. I'm more concerned with how attempting to filter the internet may a) further reduce the already dismal speeds and b) become a common tactic for blocking objectionable content as a sort of stand in for the failed 2013-2014 internet filter legislation.
I cited piracy as it was the main purpose of the censor (supposedly); whether that ends up being its actual use or not.
Can't comment on A, seeing as my only experience with Australian internet speeds is mocking my Australian friends' internet speed.
Internet censorship is a case of whack-a-mole. Block a server? They move the server. Seize a domain? Users can edit their host files (or get a new domain). Block an IP address or IP range? People will set up mirrors. The average person (and for that matter, politician) are seemingly unaware of this and waste a lot of time and money forming non-solutions. In some cases I'm actually supportive of B occurring due to the Streisand Effect. Their attempts at censoring information ends up spreading the message further and gives it a microphone and limelight in an increasing number of cases.
Re: Australian Government Green-Lights Internet Filter
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could download things into a seedbox and then download from there at your current 600kb/s. Essentially you're renting a server dedicated to downloading things. E: Browsing would be slower. Although there are a lot of pay-for VPN's that work quickly. Also I don't think downloading torrents should be effected at all.
I'm actually less concerned with the piracy aspect, I primarily use Spotify and Netflix. I'm more concerned with how attempting to filter the internet may a) further reduce the already dismal speeds and b) become a common tactic for blocking objectionable content as a sort of stand in for the failed 2013-2014 internet filter legislation.
I'm more concerned with the ease in how American corporations can so readily influence foreign governance.
Re: Australian Government Green-Lights Internet Filter
#9I would hope that a sufficiently high admin fee would be needed for each blocking request, something like $1k to $10k. Just so people wouldn't spam the office with censorship type requests.