Less is Better: Interview with DHH
uxmagazine.com
Less is Better: Interview with DHH
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Less is Better: Interview with DHH
#2This article was originally published on the User Interface Resource Center (UIRC). For more info, please see http://uxmag.com/uirc
Just FYI...
Re: Less is Better: Interview with DHH
#3Re: Less is Better: Interview with DHH
#4This interview is from a couple years ago, but the article gives no indication of that aside from this note at the very bottom in italics: This article was originally published on the User Interface Resource Center (UIRC). For more info, please see http://uxmag.com/uirc Just FYI...
Here is a more serious question: despite all the hype, Ruby on Rails never became mainstream and is dwarfed on job boards by Java and .Net. How do you explain this?
Re: Less is Better: Interview with DHH
#5This interview is from a couple years ago, but the article gives no indication of that aside from this note at the very bottom in italics: This article was originally published on the User Interface Resource Center (UIRC). For more info, please see http://uxmag.com/uirc Just FYI...
At this level, it's not even softball questions, it feels like at any moment, the interviewer is going to drop on his knees and give DHH a blow job. Here is a more serious question: despite all the hype, Ruby on Rails never became mainstream and is dwarfed on job boards by Java and .Net. How do you explain this?
Re: Less is Better: Interview with DHH
#6This sounds like an embrace of the famous "worse is better essay". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better
Re: Less is Better: Interview with DHH
#7Re: Less is Better: Interview with DHH
#8There seems to be this optimal balance that he alludes to, but never really discusses with exact detail.