The Fake 'Asian' Who Fooled 18th-Century London
theatlantic.com
The Fake 'Asian' Who Fooled 18th-Century London
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: The Fake 'Asian' Who Fooled 18th-Century London
#2Re: The Fake 'Asian' Who Fooled 18th-Century London
#3Nobles and rich merchants invited him to their dinner tables, where he spoke gibberish while inhaling mouthfuls of bloody food. There was simply no conceptual framework in place to ask the question, “Aren’t you Caucasian?” The book contained illustrations of Formosan clothing, architecture, and a grill used to roast the hearts of little boys. He wrote 12 hours each day and sustained himself with 10 to 12 drops of opium mixed with a pint of punch.
Re: The Fake 'Asian' Who Fooled 18th-Century London
#4Re: The Fake 'Asian' Who Fooled 18th-Century London
#5It must have been both exciting and frustrating to have lived in a time when there was so much unknown waiting to be discovered and yet, such limited knowledge of the world.
Re: The Fake 'Asian' Who Fooled 18th-Century London
#6https://www.academia.edu/4042982/No_Man_Is_an_Island_Early_M...
There's also this is a popularization of it that I wrote in 2013. His drawings of supposed "Formosan" (Taiwanese) townsfolk are worth checking out:
http://theappendix.net/issues/2013/10/made-in-taiwan-an-eigh...
Re: The Fake 'Asian' Who Fooled 18th-Century London
#7This sounds a little silly to me. From the way European and Arab chroniclers describe the Mongols and their appearance, it seems that people back then had a more than robust enough system of racial categorization to separately classify East Asians. More likely Taiwan was simply such a remote, alien place to Europeans that almost none of them had sufficient first- or second-hand knowledge to call Psalmanazar's bluff.
In fact, I suspect that the quoted sentence expresses the author's primary motive for even writing this piece in the first place; namely, to argue - contrary to the entire field of population genetics - that categories like "white" and "Asian" are wholly arbitrary social constructs and that races (or at least white people) don't really exist.
Re: The Fake 'Asian' Who Fooled 18th-Century London
#8> Although some ethnic distinctions existed during this period—such as the difference between light-skinned northern Europeans and sub-Saharan blacks—modern categories of race didn’t yet exist. There was simply no conceptual framework in place to ask the question, “Aren’t you Caucasian?” This sounds a little silly to me. From the way European and Arab chroniclers describe the Mongols and their appearance, it seems th…
> This post is adapted from Kembrew McLeod's new book, Pranksters: Making Mischief in the Modern World, published by NYU Press on April 1.