Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
techcrunch.com
Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
#2Well, I guess he was effectively demoted after Sundar's takeover of core products. You would expect some folks leaving after that reorg.
Re: Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
#3Interesting. I always thought Alan was one of the most quietly effective executives I've worked under. I wonder what the new culture & executive structure of Google will look like after this shake-up.
Re: Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
#4Well, I guess he was effectively demoted after Sundar's takeover of core products. You would expect some folks leaving after that reorg.
Did you read the article at all? It says right in the second paragraph that he's retiring.
Re: Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
#5Well, I guess he was effectively demoted after Sundar's takeover of core products. You would expect some folks leaving after that reorg.
Did you read the article at all? It says right in the second paragraph that he's retiring.
You do realize that in the world of boardrooms, "retiring" is just the reason somebody gives when they need to save face and they don't want to cause an incident. Incidents typically effect stock prices...
Now, I'm not saying you're wrong, or that he's for sure not actually retiring (he's close age-wise, after all), but I'd argue most retirements aren't.
Re: Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
#6Xoogler here. One of the things I remember (and respected) most about Alan was his promotion of the Unconscious Bias at Work training. I found it to be HUGELY valuable, and would recommend it for anyone hiring or managing at a business of any size... startup to corporate.
You can see a public version of the Unconscious Bias training on the Google Ventures video library: https://www.gv.com/lib/unconscious-bias-at-work
Re: Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you read the article at all? It says right in the second paragraph that he's retiring.
You do realize that in the world of boardrooms, "retiring" is just the reason somebody gives when they need to save face and they don't want to cause an incident. Incidents typically effect stock prices... Now, I'm not saying you're wrong, or that he's for sure not actually retiring (he's close age-wise, after all), but I'd argue most retirements aren't.
When you jump from the stratosphere, and are wealthy, returning the same desktop you've had for a decade may seem underwhelming.
Re: Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
#8Xoogler here. One of the things I remember (and respected) most about Alan was his promotion of the Unconscious Bias at Work training. I found it to be HUGELY valuable, and would recommend it for anyone hiring or managing at a business of any size... startup to corporate. You can see a public version of the Unconscious Bias training on the Google Ventures video library: https://www.gv.com/lib/unconscious-bias-at-work
Alan has also been a great supporter of Women Techmakers, both in terms of internal support and physically going to all the events; I've seen him more at women-in-tech events since leaving Google than I ever did while working there!
Re: Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
#9Well, I guess he was effectively demoted after Sundar's takeover of core products. You would expect some folks leaving after that reorg.
Alan is extremely well respected at Google. I seriously doubt Sundar had anything to do with it. Alan has effectively been retired for several years now (ever since he took a hiatus to work on the stratosphere jump).
Re: Google’s SVP of Knowledge, Alan Eustace, Is Leaving
#10Well, I guess he was effectively demoted after Sundar's takeover of core products. You would expect some folks leaving after that reorg.
Alan is extremely well respected at Google. I seriously doubt Sundar had anything to do with it. Alan has effectively been retired for several years now (ever since he took a hiatus to work on the stratosphere jump).
I don't disagree with your point. To clarify, I was stating that it's expected to hear people leaving following a decrease in responsibility; I was not trying to imply that such change has been necessarily involuntary. It could very well be the other way around, in fact, i.e. a reorg happens as a result of one's intent to retire in the near future.