Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
scienceblog.com
Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
1–10 of 35 posts
Re: Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
#2The article didn't have a link to the GitHub project page, so here it is: https://github.com/USArmyResearchLab/Dshell
Re: Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
#3This is pretty cool. I didn't know the Army Research Lab used Python in any of their projects.
Thanks for sharing this.
Re: Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
#4The article didn't have a link to the GitHub project page, so here it is: https://github.com/USArmyResearchLab/Dshell
This is exactly what I was trying to point out. If you put an article about something, be sure to link it.
Re: Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
#5This is pretty cool. I didn't know the Army Research Lab used Python in any of their projects. Thanks for sharing this.
Re: Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
#6The article didn't have a link to the GitHub project page, so here it is: https://github.com/USArmyResearchLab/Dshell
This is exactly what I was trying to point out. If you put an article about something, be sure to link it.
It drives me crazy when this doesn't happen– especially in news articles talking about some study here or there- why not link to the actual study?! I end up having to Google for it, click around a bunch of bad navigation... very painful.
Re: Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
#7(Released >1 month ago)
Re: Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
#8This is leet.
Re: Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
#9Why is this better than tshark?
Re: Army open-sources cyber defense code in new GitHub project
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is exactly what I was trying to point out. If you put an article about something, be sure to link it.
It drives me crazy when this doesn't happen– especially in news articles talking about some study here or there- why not link to the actual study?! I end up having to Google for it, click around a bunch of bad navigation... very painful.
I've recently (and when I say recently, I mean less than 24 hours ago) found out that one nationally known tabloid actually copied my work on their site without any indications on where they found out about it. Of course, they haven't even put a link to the original work (which I published on my blog), but they were kind enough to let their readers know that "researchers" found out about it.
I can't even explain how frustrated I currently am by their action.