Live data from Hacker News

Underactuated Rotor for Simple Micro Air Vehicles

modlabupenn.org

1–10 of 84 posts

Re: Underactuated Rotor for Simple Micro Air Vehicles

#3
I wonder if this will cause some parts of the motor to heat up more; since the blade is 1:1 rotations with the motor then driving more torque (power) during certain phases of the cycle will put more watts on certain coils.

It's a cool idea. Human size helicopters would love to avoid all that blade-pitch complexity. :)

Re: Underactuated Rotor for Simple Micro Air Vehicles

#6
Very clever! I hadn't fully understood the mechanical complexities involved in a standard single-rotor helicopter. I just thought that they were hard to fly manually (which made me very confused to see all the computer-controlled quadrocopters - why didn't they use just one rotor?)

Re: Underactuated Rotor for Simple Micro Air Vehicles

#7

I wonder if this will cause some parts of the motor to heat up more; since the blade is 1:1 rotations with the motor then driving more torque (power) during certain phases of the cycle will put more watts on certain coils. It's a cool idea. Human size helicopters would love to avoid all that blade-pitch complexity. :)

Couldn't that be addressed (if a large enough effect to be a problem) by just having the body of the vehicle spin at a low rate, like less that 1Hz. With appropriate sensors this wouldn't be a problem[1]. More to the point, there shouldn't be any need for sustained constant "cyclic" input anyway, in normal maneuvering.

[1] an axially-symmetric imaging system could compensate easily, e.g. a panoramic system.

Post reply on HN