Half the papers at NIPS would be rejected if the review process were rerun

The site guidelines explicitly ask you not to post questions like this in the threads, but rather to email them to hn@ycombinator.com. The minutiae of title editing are not on topic here.

Re: Half the papers at NIPS would be rejected if the review process were rerun

#7

Post by [deleted] » Mon, Dec 15, 2014, 8:40 PM UTC

[deleted] wrote: post #3

[deleted] wrote: post #2

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Re: Half the papers at NIPS would be rejected if the review process were rerun

#8

Post by at-fates-hands » Mon, Dec 15, 2014, 8:40 PM UTC

Is this the Neural Information Processing Systems convention you're talking about?

I'm sure more than a few people won't have any idea what "NIPS" stands for.

Re: Half the papers at NIPS would be rejected if the review process were rerun

#9

Post by rtkwe » Mon, Dec 15, 2014, 8:47 PM UTC

hyperbovine wrote: post #4

What is going on with these graphics?

It's an XKCD styled graph by the looks of it. There are a couple generators out there that take data and make the hand drawn looking graphs. e.g http://xkcdgraphs.com/

Re: Half the papers at NIPS would be rejected if the review process were rerun

#10

Post by [deleted] » Mon, Dec 15, 2014, 8:58 PM UTC

rtkwe wrote: post #9

hyperbovine wrote: post #4

What is going on with these graphics?

It's an XKCD styled graph by the looks of it. There are a couple generators out there that take data and make the hand drawn looking graphs. e.g http://xkcdgraphs.com/

[deleted]