Containers for Windows
blog.spoon.net
Containers for Windows
1–10 of 44 posts
Re: Containers for Windows
#2Re: Containers for Windows
#3Re: Containers for Windows
#4That means it's not containerization, but virtualization. This hardly compares to the Docker world which offers a intermediate build system (edit: Spoon has a build system however), rich command line tools (edit: it does provide some command line tools) to work with images and containers, fast spin up times, and an ecosystem of container management tools.
Oh, and also this:
> Spoon.net is free to use with public repositories. Private repositories, automated testing, legacy OS and browser emulation, and other advanced features are available in paid subscriptions starting at $19 per month.
And.... that it isn't open source.
-- It does however supporting composing of build images, which is kind of nice. I've learned to like mounting volumes as a form of composing though within Docker.
Re: Containers for Windows
#5As someone who has had a hell of a time setting up and consistently getting running certain programming language environments, this appeals to me greatly. It was countless headaches getting Clojure to work, and I still can't update cabal for Haskell without breaking everything.
Af for Haskel cabal hell, just use "cabal sandbox" and be happy.
Re: Containers for Windows
#6[1] https://spoon.net/docs/getting-started/transitioning-from-do...
Re: Containers for Windows
#7Re: Containers for Windows
#8What I found was marketing looking to treat containerization as nothing more than a buzz word. The article is tone deaf. It talks about running foreign OSes and legacy support proud in itself because docker cannot. Yet blind to the reason docker cannot: Docker is containers!
Any VM can do what this is doing. This is boring and I feel taken advantage of. They promised Containers can gave fast deployment VMs. On their own that is cool, but not when wrapped in a lie.