Angular 2 Core
docs.google.com
Angular 2 Core
1–10 of 279 posts
Re: Angular 2 Core
#2(Because it looks fascinating, but I'd like to see some detailed documentation and examples on how it's going to work.)
Re: Angular 2 Core
#3Is there anywhere with further detail on this? (Because it looks fascinating, but I'd like to see some detailed documentation and examples on how it's going to work.)
It's not proper documentation but debates and design documents but it's all there.
Of course - not to forget https://github.com/angular/Angular2.design
Re: Angular 2 Core
#4[1] http://angularjs.blogspot.fi/2014/04/angular-and-durandal-co....
Re: Angular 2 Core
#5Breaking how the framework looks this drastically is both very brave and very risky. Especially since from discussions with Angular core (and as you can see from the presentation) - Angular 2.0 relies heavily on ES6 features and syntax which are not yet supported in any browser and worse - are not known by most web developers anyway.
Re: Angular 2 Core
#6Angular 2 looks really cool... they seem to be embracing the shadow-dom concepts (like polymer) as well as es6-style import directives and expansion. I still think I made the right decision, but this is really cool and looks to be something that can work really well on current/next-gen browsers, but maybe not so well on currently supported browsers such as limited support for IE8 in my case :-(
I've been saying for a while that React/Flux is probably the best solution today for web applications, and that something similar to Polymer would be the best option in 3-5 years. I'll be watching this with great anticipation as Angular 2 actually changes most of my complaints about the framework today, and is really something that will come to work well.
Though, I'm not sure if they have or plan on a server-side component to handling server rendering, which is a huge part of why I went with React+Flux.
-- adding to my post --
More Info: http://ng-learn.org/2014/03/AngularJS-2-Status-Preview/
Looks like they are indeed using Traceur as a migration path, and embracing many ES6 features. Not sure how they will go with Promises, or if they'll wind up going down the generator path. There's definately some interesting reading and watching for the next year or two on this. Also, really curious where Polymer is heading in the light of this as well.
Re: Angular 2 Core
#7The problem I see with this is that it's very different from Angular 1 to the point people using Angular would have to learn it all over again. Breaking how the framework looks this drastically is both very brave and very risky. Especially since from discussions with Angular core (and as you can see from the presentation) - Angular 2.0 relies heavily on ES6 features and syntax which are not yet supported in any brows…
Re: Angular 2 Core
#8The problem I see with this is that it's very different from Angular 1 to the point people using Angular would have to learn it all over again. Breaking how the framework looks this drastically is both very brave and very risky. Especially since from discussions with Angular core (and as you can see from the presentation) - Angular 2.0 relies heavily on ES6 features and syntax which are not yet supported in any brows…
The tooling will be the most interesting to me, I can only guess that they'll use node and traceur for building the output in a project to something a browser can use. I've been moving towards React (and Flux) as it lines up well with the way I've been developing with node. This just takes it a step farther.
As for the features that aren't well known, this will change and have to be learned. There's enough in the ES6 stuff that I'm running new development against Node 0.11 so that I can get generator support and some other language features in place. Though still using the CommonJS/Node style require() statements.
I do hope, that like React and its' tooling that the Angular guys have a compelling case and support for shared server/client logic and rendering as well as support for Browserify and Webpack+hot-reload. Though I like Webpack I think it goes too far from the node system, it is really nice however and I can see why others use it.
It's all really interesting... I'm curious to see where Polymer goes from here as well...
Re: Angular 2 Core
#9The problem I see with this is that it's very different from Angular 1 to the point people using Angular would have to learn it all over again. Breaking how the framework looks this drastically is both very brave and very risky. Especially since from discussions with Angular core (and as you can see from the presentation) - Angular 2.0 relies heavily on ES6 features and syntax which are not yet supported in any brows…
Re: Angular 2 Core
#10This makes me think that Angular didn't think through their API for the 1.0 release. I would have thought Angular could have been written to improve the performance where needed without such drastic changes to the framework.