Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
indiegogo.com
Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
#2Re: Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
#3I really like Mou. I use it nearly every day and I'd love to see this campaign to be successful.
Re: Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
#4I really like Mou. I use it nearly every day and I'd love to see this campaign to be successful.
Same here. It's changed the way I write. I recall how much I've already contributed though! This 1.0 release as been a long time coming.
Re: Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
#5My only issue is that the app has been fairly dormant for several months, maybe even up to a year, and I'm not sure what's prompted the urgency to finish and release Mou. It's come such a long way gradually and I hope it isn't rushed at the end.
I also hope it'll be taken in the same direction as originally intended, rather than to extract every last penny out of it. Of course, it's great to see Chen getting the sales he deserves, but I really hope he keeps in mind his original vision.
Re: Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
#6Re: Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
#7The project vaguely states: "We'll pick the most wanted features from our contributors, implement them in 1.0." But there needs to be a little more meat here. What are some examples of the types of features you are considering? What are the new killer features that will be coming?
Re: Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
#8I use Mou every day as well. But the goal of this project seems very vague. Exactly what is going to be added in the "1.0" release? Mou works pretty well for me right now . What is going to be added that will make it worth my while sponsoring this project? The project vaguely states: "We'll pick the most wanted features from our contributors, implement them in 1.0." But there needs to be a little more meat here. What…
Other than that, I'd say it's a good candidate for a 1.0.0 release, so I'm not sure exactly what the need for $20k is, unless it's to reimburse for time already spent?
Re: Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
#9The developers of this project just don't actively respond to users' need. The development is so slow and I don't think they deserve the money.
I guess the Mou developers don't use GitHub at all? So why the software don't support GitHub Flavored Markdown (for a long time)? Every time I open the README.md of some project containing highlight syntax like this:
```js
var test;
```
the document is a mess! I end up writing my README.md in ST3 or vim.
Re: Mou 1.0 coming early 2015
#10I've used Mou and I think it's pretty stable. I don't see a problem with simply charging for it now. It seems unnecessary to raise money and bring on a whole team.
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7948079