Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
bloomberg.com
Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
1–10 of 50 posts
Re: Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
#2the ruling gives Goldman an incentive to keep the ambiguous language in place so it can reserve the right to make “unpredictable post hoc determinations about which former employees should be advanced attorney’s fees and which shouldn’t,” Fuentes wrote.
Maybe there's some selection bias going, or I'm a contrarian, but somehow dissents usually make more sense than rulings.
Re: Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
#3A VP at Goldman is, I think, the third lowest ranking front-office position. Not only is it not the sort of "officer" that Delaware law contemplates, but it's also not the sort of context Delaware law contemplates. Aleynikov wasn't accused of wrongdoing in his official capacity as an officer of the corporation. That might be something like a CEO being accused of funneling contracts to his brother's company. Aleynikov was accused of wrongdoing that was incidental to his employment.
Re: Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
#4VPs don't need to manage a team, but they do often shoulder some responsibility for a project, or maybe, even run the project. Usually, it is the level of pay that bumps them into the VP bracket. Not much else.
Re: Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
#5They're all vice presidents there? American Psycho is becoming truer every day. the ruling gives Goldman an incentive to keep the ambiguous language in place so it can reserve the right to make “unpredictable post hoc determinations about which former employees should be advanced attorney’s fees and which shouldn’t,” Fuentes wrote. Maybe there's some selection bias going, or I'm a contrarian, but somehow dissents usu…
Re: Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
#6They're all vice presidents there? American Psycho is becoming truer every day. the ruling gives Goldman an incentive to keep the ambiguous language in place so it can reserve the right to make “unpredictable post hoc determinations about which former employees should be advanced attorney’s fees and which shouldn’t,” Fuentes wrote. Maybe there's some selection bias going, or I'm a contrarian, but somehow dissents usu…
Re: Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
#7They're all vice presidents there? American Psycho is becoming truer every day. the ruling gives Goldman an incentive to keep the ambiguous language in place so it can reserve the right to make “unpredictable post hoc determinations about which former employees should be advanced attorney’s fees and which shouldn’t,” Fuentes wrote. Maybe there's some selection bias going, or I'm a contrarian, but somehow dissents usu…
Re: Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
#8They're all vice presidents there? American Psycho is becoming truer every day. the ruling gives Goldman an incentive to keep the ambiguous language in place so it can reserve the right to make “unpredictable post hoc determinations about which former employees should be advanced attorney’s fees and which shouldn’t,” Fuentes wrote. Maybe there's some selection bias going, or I'm a contrarian, but somehow dissents usu…
Re: Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
#9Re: Sergey Aleynikov Loses in Goldman Fight Over Fees
#10Why are legal costs so ridiculously high in the states?
And it looks like he got his money's worth. There was no dispute that he took the code. His "open source" defense apparently fell through, and a jury convicted him. He only won on appeal because he convinced the Second Circuit that software wasn't a trade secret within the Electronic Espionage Act, something which Congress went and explicitly my added in response to the court case.