No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
1–10 of 51 posts
Re: No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
#21. https://blog.twitter.com/2013/new-tweets-per-second-record-a...
Re: No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
#3Re: No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
#4Twitter lets you tweet 140 characters regardless of the bit width of those characters in. For Japanese, I think almost all characters take two bytes in utf-8. As such, given the same number of tweets, the bandwidth usage is approx 2X.
Twitter also seems much more useful in ideogram languages as 140 characters = 140 words = an article. In English, 140 characters = a short/medium sized sentence.
Re: No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
#5Didn't read the article, but I did grep it for unicode and utf-8 and found no matches, so this might also be related. Twitter lets you tweet 140 characters regardless of the bit width of those characters in. For Japanese, I think almost all characters take two bytes in utf-8. As such, given the same number of tweets, the bandwidth usage is approx 2X. Twitter also seems much more useful in ideogram languages as 140 ch…
Re: No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
#6Hearing the words "engineering speak" bothers me. Wired knows a significant portion of its readers are engineers, right?
Saying just software framework would have probably been fine. Humans are pretty good at inferring the meaning of words from context...
Re: No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
#7This is fun localization issue. Kind of like water usage during World Cup games.
Re: No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
#8Didn't read the article, but I did grep it for unicode and utf-8 and found no matches, so this might also be related. Twitter lets you tweet 140 characters regardless of the bit width of those characters in. For Japanese, I think almost all characters take two bytes in utf-8. As such, given the same number of tweets, the bandwidth usage is approx 2X. Twitter also seems much more useful in ideogram languages as 140 ch…
As for ideograms, your statement is not correct. Kanjis allow for better content/character ratios, certainly, but one kanji is very often not one word - the word foreigner, for example, uses 3 ideograms.
On top of that, Japanese is not written solely with kanjis (as opposed to Chinese, for example). It also uses katakanas and hiraganas, which stand for phonems. This is more often the case on social networks where a lot of western words are used - western words are almost systematically written with katakanas.
Kanas are still more "efficient" than alphabets, but to reuse my previous example, foreigner is written using 5 kanas instead of 3 kanjis.
Re: No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
#9"built a new system—known as a software “framework,” in engineering speak" Hearing the words "engineering speak" bothers me. Wired knows a significant portion of its readers are engineers, right? Saying just software framework would have probably been fine. Humans are pretty good at inferring the meaning of words from context...
I seem to recall that Wired was widely regarded poorly in the technical community as early as the turn of the millenium and that it has long been viewed as something read by non-technical folks who want to feel "plugged in" to technology.
So, I'd kind of be surprised if it was really the case that a "significant portion" of Wired's readers were engineers.
Re: No One Tweets Like the Japanese, and That Was a Problem for Twitter
#10"built a new system—known as a software “framework,” in engineering speak" Hearing the words "engineering speak" bothers me. Wired knows a significant portion of its readers are engineers, right? Saying just software framework would have probably been fine. Humans are pretty good at inferring the meaning of words from context...