Reading Literature on Screen: A Price for Convenience?
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Reading Literature on Screen: A Price for Convenience?
#2Re: Reading Literature on Screen: A Price for Convenience?
#3Re: Reading Literature on Screen: A Price for Convenience?
#4Re: Reading Literature on Screen: A Price for Convenience?
#5Perhaps constantly seeing and feeling the read and unread pages of the book reinforces the sense of when things happened in the story.
Perhaps an e-book interface with stronger indicators of progress could cure the discrepancy. (One idea: shift the entire page slightly inside imbalanced margins based on how deep in the book you are.) Or perhaps people who have only ever read e-books wouldn't be as dependent on pending-pages-physicality.
Or maybe future Kindles could actually become flatter as you progress through the story, via some sort of deflation mechanism.
Re: Reading Literature on Screen: A Price for Convenience?
#6Re: Reading Literature on Screen: A Price for Convenience?
#7Perhaps constantly seeing and feeling the read and unread pages of the book reinforces the sense of when things happened in the story.
I strongly suspect you're right. I know that before I could 'grep' digital text, when I remembered something I read in a book, I'd have a rough idea of its page-depth and position on page (in addition to general context) which aided in a visual-scan to re-locate. Perhaps an e-book interface with stronger indicators of progress could cure the discrepancy. (One idea: shift the entire page slightly inside imbalanced mar…
Re: Reading Literature on Screen: A Price for Convenience?
#8For some reason, they chose a Kindle DX which is not book-like at all, and would have substantially larger pages. Why wouldn't they have just used normal Kindles?
I'm sad that it's still so expensive, though, especially since it has that dirty gray look compared to the newer e-ink readers.