The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
nytimes.com
The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
1–10 of 94 posts
Re: The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
#2Re: The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
#3No surprises here, of course this is what happens when you create an agency whose mission is to lie, decieve, and break the law, and then give it limited oversight and almost unlimited funding. The CIA's entire history is just one scandal after another.
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat...
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_Guatemalan_coup_d%27%C3%A9...
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Project
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Bolivia
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_1949_Syrian_coup_d%27%C3%...
And the list goes on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_United_States_foreign_re...
What a tangled web we weave.
Re: The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
#4No surprises here, of course this is what happens when you create an agency whose mission is to lie, decieve, and break the law, and then give it limited oversight and almost unlimited funding. The CIA's entire history is just one scandal after another.
Re: The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
#5No surprises here, of course this is what happens when you create an agency whose mission is to lie, decieve, and break the law, and then give it limited oversight and almost unlimited funding. The CIA's entire history is just one scandal after another.
The CIA's charter forbids any domestic campaigns...
Re: The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
#6Re: The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
#7Re: The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
#8No surprises here, of course this is what happens when you create an agency whose mission is to lie, decieve, and break the law, and then give it limited oversight and almost unlimited funding. The CIA's entire history is just one scandal after another.
The CIA's charter forbids any domestic campaigns...
Re: The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
#9"Improper access"? Are you kidding me? I guess Manning was a fool for not "apologizing" for his "improper access". That would've definitely saved him.
What's worse is that even after Feinstein accused them of hacking and spying, they still did it afterwards [1]. And if they get away with it now, they will most definitely continue to do it.
[1] - https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140731/18065928080/cia-s...
Re: The CIA's Reckless Breach of Trust
#10That makes it sound like the investigation is politically motivated, which I find disappointing. It seems highly likely that some of those practices continued under Obama, and if there's any hint of political leaning in an investigation like this then most people will just ignore it as more partisan bullshit.