Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
#2I'm now a full stack web developer (by meteor). With Famo.us and Phongap I can now easily to build a cross-browser html5 app with native-like UI. In my opinion, it's the future of agile development, especially for startups.
Re: Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
#3[deleted]
Re: Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
#4[deleted]
Re: Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
#5I'm now a full stack web developer (by meteor). With Famo.us and Phongap I can now easily to build a cross-browser html5 app with native-like UI. In my opinion, it's the future of agile development, especially for startups.
That's the idea right? Have you put it into practice?
Re: Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
#6[deleted]
[deleted]
Re: Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
#7I knew it was only a matter of time before "flash.js" happened.
Re: Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
#8Re: Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
#9I think it is easy to confuse developers unfamiliar with 3D graphics into thinking Famo.us is doing something unique, special, or new. I like the idea, but the "amazing demos" I am seeing are just extremely basic 3D & 2D operations, not really successfully replacing the ease of use traditional DOM elements provide. This space will get a lot of players, now that the essential idea is seeded in a zillion developers minds.
Re: Famo.us: do we really need another Javascript framework?
#10I'm now a full stack web developer (by meteor). With Famo.us and Phongap I can now easily to build a cross-browser html5 app with native-like UI. In my opinion, it's the future of agile development, especially for startups.
I'm guessing this has to be satire.