Live data from Hacker News

Google+ Head Vic Gundotra Leaving Company

recode.net

1–10 of 267 posts

Re: Google+ Head Vic Gundotra Leaving Company

#6
post #2

[deleted]

Google+ should have launched secretly and conservatively, instead of big announcement and smash/crash into every feature. There are some aspects of it that are very appealing (mostly the nonsocial ones...) that I find useful, but due to my initial repulsion to the 'major change' I am less likely to invest in using.

Re: Google+ Head Vic Gundotra Leaving Company

#8
post #7

How is it an "exclusive"? it's all there in public posts: Vic: https://plus.google.com/+VicGundotra/posts/MFrDF3W4RJL Larry: https://plus.google.com/+LarryPage/posts/A2gm48nzitx

They had the story under embargo... looks like recode posted the same time as Vic did.

Re: Google+ Head Vic Gundotra Leaving Company

#9
"This is a group of people who built social at Google against the skepticism of so many.”

Well, he does have a sense of humor. They sure built it, I see many obscure names ranking on search engines...only to see an G+ empty page (along with a Youtube one--also empty. Looks like the Android signup process.)

Re: Google+ Head Vic Gundotra Leaving Company

#10
post #2

[deleted]

Google+ should have launched secretly and conservatively, instead of big announcement and smash/crash into every feature. There are some aspects of it that are very appealing (mostly the nonsocial ones...) that I find useful, but due to my initial repulsion to the 'major change' I am less likely to invest in using.

The big announcement was fine. The problem is they hardly let anyone in after the big announcement. I remember there being a huge hype for Google+ when it was announced. But almost no one got invites, and those that did couldn't do anything on it so they quickly lost interest. It's hard to get excited about a social network when none of your friends can be a part of it.
Post reply on HN