LibreSSL

Edit: To those downvoting, yes, I saw the footer. This doesn't excuse their childish behavior. I will not be donating to this project if this is the level of seriousness they have for it.

Re: LibreSSL

#6

Post by claudius » Tue, Apr 22, 2014, 6:57 AM UTC

It seems that is is indeed the official site (as linked-to on http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/), just in case there are any doubts…for no reason whatsoever.

Re: LibreSSL

#7

Post by anaphor » Tue, Apr 22, 2014, 6:58 AM UTC

DiabloD3 wrote: post #5

Comic Sans? Really? Edit: To those downvoting, yes, I saw the footer. This doesn't excuse their childish behavior. I will not be donating to this project if this is the level of seriousness they have for it.

Maybe you should consider donating

Re: LibreSSL

#8

Post by rurounijones » Tue, Apr 22, 2014, 6:59 AM UTC

DiabloD3 wrote: post #5

Comic Sans? Really? Edit: To those downvoting, yes, I saw the footer. This doesn't excuse their childish behavior. I will not be donating to this project if this is the level of seriousness they have for it.

Blatantly done on purpose to:

A) In the smallprint: "This page scientifically designed to annoy web hipsters." (Mission accomplished)

B) Make it obvious that this is a temporary site (In case the disclaimer wasn't enough)

And if you really want to see the lengths they went to to annoy web people, look at the source

Re: LibreSSL

#9

Post by rurounijones » Tue, Apr 22, 2014, 7:00 AM UTC

Since this is related. I have a question:

How can they know that they have not broken something in their flensing without any automated testing since no tests is one of the big problems with OpenSSL?

Re: LibreSSL

#10

Post by edent » Tue, Apr 22, 2014, 7:00 AM UTC

Somewhat ironic that https://www.libressl.org/ doesn't work, no?