Live data from Hacker News

Saleae, an SF hardware startup brings crafted logic analyzers

saleae.com

1–10 of 14 posts

Re: Saleae, an SF hardware startup brings crafted logic analyzers

#5
Sigh.

I really like the concept, I really dislike the lock-in. I think what I want is the unholy love-child of Saleae and Dangerous Prototypes[1]. I've got the original version of DP's Logic Sniffer [2] and built a really nice USB 2.0 protocol analyzer with it. The combination of open source, inexpensive hardware, and awesome documentation let me take it in a direction that no one else had. Salea on the other hand has really slick software that is sexy as heck, but only runs on Windows and well, I am really trying hard to not have to have a Windows box around on my workbench.

[1] http://dangerousprototypes.com/

[2] http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/preorder-open-workbench-log...

Re: Saleae, an SF hardware startup brings crafted logic analyzers

#6
I bought the Logic 16 a couple of years ago and it's a neat piece of hardware, but the software is really basic and stagnant. I'm jealous of the triggering and overall UI something like Oscium provides (http://vimeo.com/42342243) and I keep hoping this will come in a future software upgrade.

Re: Saleae, an SF hardware startup brings crafted logic analyzers

#7
post #5

Sigh. I really like the concept, I really dislike the lock-in. I think what I want is the unholy love-child of Saleae and Dangerous Prototypes[1]. I've got the original version of DP's Logic Sniffer [2] and built a really nice USB 2.0 protocol analyzer with it. The combination of open source, inexpensive hardware, and awesome documentation let me take it in a direction that no one else had. Salea on the other hand ha…

The good news is that we have cross platform software & and APIs for using the device without our software and writing your own analyzer plugins.

These products won't sample fast enough for decoding USB 2.0 high speed, but we do support low speed and full speed with the existing products and the new stuff.

-Mark (Saleae)

Re: Saleae, an SF hardware startup brings crafted logic analyzers

#8
post #5

Sigh. I really like the concept, I really dislike the lock-in. I think what I want is the unholy love-child of Saleae and Dangerous Prototypes[1]. I've got the original version of DP's Logic Sniffer [2] and built a really nice USB 2.0 protocol analyzer with it. The combination of open source, inexpensive hardware, and awesome documentation let me take it in a direction that no one else had. Salea on the other hand ha…

You are being really naive and unfair here.

Saleae suffered a lot from chinese copycats. People copied their hardware for pennies, while saleae was fair enough to provide their software without copy protection.

I think it is only fair they release custom hardware now.

Re: Saleae, an SF hardware startup brings crafted logic analyzers

#9
post #8
post #5

Sigh. I really like the concept, I really dislike the lock-in. I think what I want is the unholy love-child of Saleae and Dangerous Prototypes[1]. I've got the original version of DP's Logic Sniffer [2] and built a really nice USB 2.0 protocol analyzer with it. The combination of open source, inexpensive hardware, and awesome documentation let me take it in a direction that no one else had. Salea on the other hand ha…

You are being really naive and unfair here. Saleae suffered a lot from chinese copycats. People copied their hardware for pennies, while saleae was fair enough to provide their software without copy protection. I think it is only fair they release custom hardware now.

Unfair I might concede but not naive. I've been doing circuit development for a long time. I also have a challenge with 'copied for pennies.' Software you can copy for pennies but hardware really does require some tooling which is not 'pennies'.

There is a market for 'soft' test equipment. The amount of margin available in that market it something worth debating. I've got a USB oscilloscope that has proprietary software that only works on Windows XP, I've got a Tek475 oscilloscope with similar specs from 1981 that works on anything. They both cost about the same amount (just under $300) The point (for me at least) is that the 'softness' of test equipment, where it relies on a third party OS/computer to work) has a negative value coefficient. I know that at some point its going to be worthless, unlike the Tek scope which, as long as it can be calibrated, will have intrinsic value.

That is what I like about the SUMP based designs that DP did. They took the risk away by publishing all their source and letting me decide if I'm willing to do the work (or hire someone to do the work) of keeping the test gear running on my current hardware. I get tired of the 'Atmel' based digital o'scopes but eventually we'll get a decent open source front end and then all bets will be off in terms of being able to make something useful, and more important to me durable. I'd like my test gear to have an expected 20 - 30 year lifespan, it isn't like the test problems change.

Post reply on HN