Please Replace Credit Cards
seanmonstar.com
Please Replace Credit Cards
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Please Replace Credit Cards
#2Currently credit card companies charge (some) users to have a card, charge all merchants a fee and a percentage, and take none of the risk. That's the thing that ought to change.
Re: Please Replace Credit Cards
#3I have a better solution: keep everything exactly as it is now, but have credit card companies accept that the system is slightly susceptible to fraud, and consequently have them take the hit if your card gets stolen. The customer (people who buy things and merchants who take cards) shouldn't ever lose out if they're victims of a crime. Currently credit card companies charge (some) users to have a card, charge all me…
Re: Please Replace Credit Cards
#4I have a better solution: keep everything exactly as it is now, but have credit card companies accept that the system is slightly susceptible to fraud, and consequently have them take the hit if your card gets stolen. The customer (people who buy things and merchants who take cards) shouldn't ever lose out if they're victims of a crime. Currently credit card companies charge (some) users to have a card, charge all me…
They do take the hit. Under the Fair Credit Billing Act, your responsibility for unauthorized charges is $50, and if you report it before any unauthorized charges are made, then it's $0.
Re: Please Replace Credit Cards
#5Earlier quoted context omitted.
They do take the hit. Under the Fair Credit Billing Act, your responsibility for unauthorized charges is $50, and if you report it before any unauthorized charges are made, then it's $0.
Things are not the same here in the UK. Since we got chip and pin cards the onus is on the cardholder - it is assumed that you didn't keep your pin secure.
Since you didn't mean it that way, perhaps you could mention that you're switching contexts?
In any case, according to my limited understanding, the UK regulatory landscape changed with the Financial Services Authority (FSA) Payment Services Regulations 2009.
The relevant rule is at http://www.fca.org.uk/static/fca/documents/fsa-psd-approach-... :
> If the payment service provider can show that the payer has acted fraudulently, or has intentionally, or with gross negligence, not complied with their obligations regarding the security of the payment instrument, the payer will be liable for all losses. To avoid doubt, it is not sufficient for the payment service provider to assert that the customer ‘must have’ divulged the personalised security features of the payment instrument, and to effectively require the customer to prove that he did not. The burden of proof lies with the payment service provider and if a claim that a transaction is unauthorised is rejected, the rejection must be supported by sufficient evidence to prove that the customer is guilty of fraud, gross negligence or intentional breach and the reason for the rejection must be explained to the customer.
Has it changed since then? According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chip_and_PIN it hasn't.
Re: Please Replace Credit Cards
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
They do take the hit. Under the Fair Credit Billing Act, your responsibility for unauthorized charges is $50, and if you report it before any unauthorized charges are made, then it's $0.
Things are not the same here in the UK. Since we got chip and pin cards the onus is on the cardholder - it is assumed that you didn't keep your pin secure.
Re: Please Replace Credit Cards
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Things are not the same here in the UK. Since we got chip and pin cards the onus is on the cardholder - it is assumed that you didn't keep your pin secure.
And what about online shopping, where you just typed in your card number into a site?
It's all very favourable to the credit card companies.