How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
1–10 of 48 posts
Re: How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
#2Re: How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
#3No offence. But I would be more interested in how they increased diversity without lowering the bar.
Re: How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
#4Edit: the comment thread on the site discusses this.
Re: How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
#5No offence. But I would be more interested in how they increased diversity without lowering the bar.
I was admitted to a Chemical Engineering college program, despite the fact that I had no previous high school experience in fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and the rest. No one thought that was strange.
Why is CS so different that you have to be a hot-shot programmer before you enter?
Re: How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
#6No offence. But I would be more interested in how they increased diversity without lowering the bar.
It sounds like the only thing they did with admissions was to not look at previous programming experience as a major factor. I was admitted to a Chemical Engineering college program, despite the fact that I had no previous high school experience in fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and the rest. No one thought that was strange. Why is CS so different that you have to be a hot-shot programmer before you enter?
Re: How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
#7Somehow we've made a society in which getting into computer programming at a young age is generally not something young girls are taught to want. Consequently, the huge majority of young programmers (below college age) are boys.
I started programming when I was 12. The advantage this has given me in the tech world (academia and industry) cannot be overstated. There is a giant gap between people who start programming at a young age due to desire and curiosity and people who learn to for coursework at uni.
So while not giving preferential treatment to the boys whom society has not discouraged from programming at a young age (and seems to discourage girls from it) is definitely going to increase the number of girls in the department (which is a good thing), I also think we should really figure out what element of society is making programming an undesirable hobby for young ladies.
Re: How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
#8No offence. But I would be more interested in how they increased diversity without lowering the bar.
It sounds like the only thing they did with admissions was to not look at previous programming experience as a major factor. I was admitted to a Chemical Engineering college program, despite the fact that I had no previous high school experience in fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and the rest. No one thought that was strange. Why is CS so different that you have to be a hot-shot programmer before you enter?
Re: How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
It sounds like the only thing they did with admissions was to not look at previous programming experience as a major factor. I was admitted to a Chemical Engineering college program, despite the fact that I had no previous high school experience in fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and the rest. No one thought that was strange. Why is CS so different that you have to be a hot-shot programmer before you enter?
Where is the hot-shot requirement?
Re: How CMU Increased the Proportion of Women in Computer Science (2013)
#10This is elegant to me because it approaches the problem in a bottom up way: "how can we more equitably target candidates so that we don't miss potentially great fits?", instead of top down: "how can we include more of these specific groups in our candidate pool?"