Live data from Hacker News

Linus Torvalds: “I'm happily hacking on a new save format using ‘libgit2’”

plus.google.com

1–10 of 265 posts

Re: Linus Torvalds: “I'm happily hacking on a new save format using ‘libgit2’”

#2
Worked on a project a few years ago where we needed distributed sync capability. Using git (or bazaar or mercurial) was one of the options - store everything in it versus a database. Interesting to see the same thought "coming back".

Re: Linus Torvalds: “I'm happily hacking on a new save format using ‘libgit2’”

#4
I don't quite get Linus' problem with XML for document markup (for anything else - config files, build scripts - sure, XML is horrible). Does anyone know any more details about what his specific gripe is? For me, asciidoc (which looks very similar, conceptually, to markdown) suffers from one huge problem: it's incomplete. Substituting symbols for words results in a more limited vocabulary, if that vocabulary is to remain at all memorable.

Sure, XML can be nasty, but thats very much a function of the care taken to a) format the file sensibly b) use appropriate structure (i.e. be as specific as necessary, and no more).

Re: Linus Torvalds: “I'm happily hacking on a new save format using ‘libgit2’”

#7
why do you need to view filesystem and make it readable for humans, you would interact it via commands "ls" or some gui

git as the basis of filesystem is interesting, hope we don't need to manually make branches and commits to use it

Re: Linus Torvalds: “I'm happily hacking on a new save format using ‘libgit2’”

#10

I don't quite get Linus' problem with XML for document markup (for anything else - config files, build scripts - sure, XML is horrible). Does anyone know any more details about what his specific gripe is? For me, asciidoc (which looks very similar, conceptually, to markdown) suffers from one huge problem: it's incomplete. Substituting symbols for words results in a more limited vocabulary, if that vocabulary is to re…

This link needs to be posted again and again and again.

I'm sure quite a lot of people will easily recognize it. :^)

Subject: Re: S-exp vs XML, HTML, LaTeX (was: Why lisp is growing)

https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=comp.lang.li...

Post reply on HN