Live data from Hacker News

Google’s Unusual Offer to WhatsApp

theinformation.com

1–9 of 9 posts

Re: Google’s Unusual Offer to WhatsApp

#3
I can imagine the reasoning:

"Company A said they want to be notified if we get acquisition talks wiht company B. The only reason for this is so they could make a counter-offer[1].

If Company A would only buy us to keep us out of Company B's hands then they probably don't care about us and would let us wither

So why bother?[2]"

[1] I cannot think of another reason that would cover such a short timescale

[2] ok, money, but it is still a hassle.

Re: Google’s Unusual Offer to WhatsApp

#5

I can imagine the reasoning: "Company A said they want to be notified if we get acquisition talks wiht company B. The only reason for this is so they could make a counter-offer[1]. If Company A would only buy us to keep us out of Company B's hands then they probably don't care about us and would let us wither So why bother?[2]" [1] I cannot think of another reason that would cover such a short timescale [2] ok, money…

They could also make this offer so they can have a head start in acquiring a smaller competitor cheaper ahead of the acquisition.

Re: Google’s Unusual Offer to WhatsApp

#6
Given track records, if the founders of WhatsApp wanted to keep the business going, selling to Google would have been a wrong choice. Personally, I am still waiting to see what happens to Waze as it's window of freedom comes to a close.

With Instagram and the promises made for WhatsApp by FB, this seems like a very good decision.

Re: Google’s Unusual Offer to WhatsApp

#7
I can believe Google made the offer and it was rebuffed.

But, I think the price paid here suggests there were other bidders. And, while an acquirer making an offer may want to enforce a 'no shop' agreement, the acquisition target usually wants more bidders. (Does Sequoia keep secrets from Google, when a Google bid could maximize their return?)

So I'd guess Google knew WhatsApp was discussing acquisitions.

I'd love to hear more definitively about how these competing priorities play out in a real high-stakes acquisition negotiation. (Could a Facebook, via a early rich term sheet, cajole a 'no shop' agreement from a target and expect it to stick?)

Re: Google’s Unusual Offer to WhatsApp

#9
post #5

I can imagine the reasoning: "Company A said they want to be notified if we get acquisition talks wiht company B. The only reason for this is so they could make a counter-offer[1]. If Company A would only buy us to keep us out of Company B's hands then they probably don't care about us and would let us wither So why bother?[2]" [1] I cannot think of another reason that would cover such a short timescale [2] ok, money…

They could also make this offer so they can have a head start in acquiring a smaller competitor cheaper ahead of the acquisition.

Good point.

It might also cause trouble with company B "Yeah, we promised your rivals we would tell them if someone like you approached us" is probably not the best foot to start off with :p