California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
bits.blogs.nytimes.com
California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
1–10 of 104 posts
Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
#2* Why won't someone will figure out how to trigger the phone kill switch and start wandering round SF killing people's phones at will?
* Why won't the state/NSA/whoever kill the phones of its enemies (diplomats, foreign business people, "subversives")?
* and so on.
Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
#3Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
#4There are bad ideas, and then there ideas that only a legislator would advocate.
Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
#5This seems like a bad idea. * Why won't someone will figure out how to trigger the phone kill switch and start wandering round SF killing people's phones at will? * Why won't the state/NSA/whoever kill the phones of its enemies (diplomats, foreign business people, "subversives")? * and so on.
Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
#6Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
#7Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
#8This is why computer science should be a required subject going forward, only individuals good at programming will be able to resist the tendrils, malware, viruses and government backdoor trojans trying to get inside us and instruct us what actions to perform today to fill other mens pockets with wealth whom we don't even know or care about.
Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
#9Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones
#10Governments seem increasingly interested in accessing and controlling our phones.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Localized_Alerting_Net...