Live data from Hacker News

California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones

bits.blogs.nytimes.com

1–10 of 104 posts

Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones

#2
This seems like a bad idea.

* Why won't someone will figure out how to trigger the phone kill switch and start wandering round SF killing people's phones at will?

* Why won't the state/NSA/whoever kill the phones of its enemies (diplomats, foreign business people, "subversives")?

* and so on.

Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones

#5

This seems like a bad idea. * Why won't someone will figure out how to trigger the phone kill switch and start wandering round SF killing people's phones at will? * Why won't the state/NSA/whoever kill the phones of its enemies (diplomats, foreign business people, "subversives")? * and so on.

If this such a risk, Why hasn't this happened yet? Corporate phones all have remote kill switches, and are high value targets of harassment.

Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones

#8
I have an idea, how about the government stay the hell away from my smartphone and let the free market decide what smartphones are theft-safe and which are not?

This is why computer science should be a required subject going forward, only individuals good at programming will be able to resist the tendrils, malware, viruses and government backdoor trojans trying to get inside us and instruct us what actions to perform today to fill other mens pockets with wealth whom we don't even know or care about.

Re: California Law to Require Antitheft Technology in Cellphones

#10
Reminds me of FEMA requiring carriers to install a chip for emergency messages (PLAN = Personal Localized Alerting Network). [1]

Governments seem increasingly interested in accessing and controlling our phones.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Localized_Alerting_Net...

Post reply on HN