1–10 of 28 posts
(Russian readers of HN might happen to know the site postnauka.ru, of which this is an English-language spin-off.)
Serious Science
serious-science.org
It's called "serious science" but its articles don't even cite sources for their claims. So it's actually less serious than wikipedia. Why should anyone use this over wikipedia?
It's called "serious science" but its articles don't even cite sources for their claims. So it's actually less serious than wikipedia. Why should anyone use this over wikipedia?
It's called "serious science" but its articles don't even cite sources for their claims. So it's actually less serious than wikipedia. Why should anyone use this over wikipedia?
PS: Also the "subscribe" page can, for now, just link to the youtube channel. At least I could subscribe there.
It's called "serious science" but its articles don't even cite sources for their claims. So it's actually less serious than wikipedia. Why should anyone use this over wikipedia?
I guess cauz it provides knowledge directly from scientists
(FWIW, not a commentary on source link, just on parent comment)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess cauz it provides knowledge directly from scientists
That would be our high priest caste of "scientist" from which all knowing is given. We needn't evidence or studies, people, the 'scientists' said it is so. (FWIW, not a commentary on source link, just on parent comment)
Happy now?
[0] http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=umhist...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess cauz it provides knowledge directly from scientists
That would be our high priest caste of "scientist" from which all knowing is given. We needn't evidence or studies, people, the 'scientists' said it is so. (FWIW, not a commentary on source link, just on parent comment)