Live data from Hacker News

Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen

coindesk.com

1–10 of 63 posts

Re: Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen

#3
post #2

Misleading. 1295 BTC were stolen, no USD.

Well thank goodness for that. At least this way there is no chance of recovery.

I enjoyed the bit at the end about a potential lawsuit to get the BTC back. Sounds awfully familiar to the legal posturing after some other BTC heists--none of which got anywhere AFAIK.

Do people still think the irrevocability of BTC transactions is a good thing?

Re: Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen

#6
post #3
post #2

Misleading. 1295 BTC were stolen, no USD.

Well thank goodness for that. At least this way there is no chance of recovery. I enjoyed the bit at the end about a potential lawsuit to get the BTC back. Sounds awfully familiar to the legal posturing after some other BTC heists--none of which got anywhere AFAIK. Do people still think the irrevocability of BTC transactions is a good thing?

yes. events like this encourage better security.

Re: Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen

#7
post #3
post #2

Misleading. 1295 BTC were stolen, no USD.

Well thank goodness for that. At least this way there is no chance of recovery. I enjoyed the bit at the end about a potential lawsuit to get the BTC back. Sounds awfully familiar to the legal posturing after some other BTC heists--none of which got anywhere AFAIK. Do people still think the irrevocability of BTC transactions is a good thing?

>Do people still think the irrevocability of BTC transactions is a good thing?

Yes. Third parties will provide escrow/insurance services if there is demand for them. Transactions been irreversible "by default" is a core benefit of bitcoin and merchants may preffer that over chargebacks at 18€.

Re: Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen

#8
post #4
post #2

Misleading. 1295 BTC were stolen, no USD.

They seem to be currently worth more than $1 million USD though. Maybe the USD equivalent was chosen for the title because more people would be able to immediately relate to it as a value.

this is common linkbait tactic now. They take the current high trading value of BTC & multiply by the number of BTC involved to get some crazy-high-looking USD price. It's not money in hand, the reality of getting that money out of BTC can be pricey.

Re: Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen

#9
post #7
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well thank goodness for that. At least this way there is no chance of recovery. I enjoyed the bit at the end about a potential lawsuit to get the BTC back. Sounds awfully familiar to the legal posturing after some other BTC heists--none of which got anywhere AFAIK. Do people still think the irrevocability of BTC transactions is a good thing?

>Do people still think the irrevocability of BTC transactions is a good thing? Yes. Third parties will provide escrow/insurance services if there is demand for them. Transactions been irreversible "by default" is a core benefit of bitcoin and merchants may preffer that over chargebacks at 18€.

I've heard that this type of insurance is expensive and a large part of banks' transaction fees. I can only imagine how expensive an insurance service like that for Bitcoin would be.

Re: Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1M Stolen

#10
post #8
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They seem to be currently worth more than $1 million USD though. Maybe the USD equivalent was chosen for the title because more people would be able to immediately relate to it as a value.

this is common linkbait tactic now. They take the current high trading value of BTC & multiply by the number of BTC involved to get some crazy-high-looking USD price. It's not money in hand, the reality of getting that money out of BTC can be pricey.

Which is why bitcoin is secure and liquid - great as a utility currency.

So you're saying the transaction costs of converting from bitcoin to any useful currency is really high and that we should see the unattractiveness of money-servicing costs as a security-assurance since script-kiddie criminals don't like seeing any portion of their free "money" siphoned away by the money-changers in the temple.

Post reply on HN